<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-04-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2167" />
  <endPage num="2266" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Entertainment Complex</name>
      <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000802">
        <heading>ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-04-07">
            <name>ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-04-07T15:05:00" />
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000803">
          <timeStamp time="2009-04-07T15:05:00" />
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD (Florey) (15:05):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. Can he advise members about whether he is concerned about the opposition's plan to build an inner city football stadium and entertainment complex on a reported earthquake fault line?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-04-07">
            <name>ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-04-07T15:05:00" />
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000804">
          <timeStamp time="2009-04-07T15:05:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (15:05):</by>  I had to point this out, because you would not read this one in <term>The Advertiser</term> or hear it on <term>Today Tonight</term>.</text>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000805">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000806">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon:</by>  She is still going on about the fault line.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000807">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  Can I say from the outset that while some conspiracy theorists at <term>Today Tonight</term> would like us to believe that the new hospital would be built on a fault line, through the process to scope the new hospital that will be built on the site geologists have advised the health minister that after undertaking extensive—</text>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000808">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000809">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000810">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  —core samples there is no evidence of a fault line running through the site. That is the advice that we have. But let us assume that there is a fault line. Let us listen to the opposition.</text>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000811">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000812">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  Well, we are told there is not but, as I said, you would not get this scrutiny from <term>The Advertiser</term> because it does not suit their argument. Last month the Deputy Leader of the Opposition again opposed the building of the new Royal Adelaide Hospital on the rail yards, this time stating, amongst her objections, that it would be wrong to build a new hospital on an earthquake fault line. On 23 March, the Deputy Leader of the Opposition told ABC 891:</text>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000813">
          <inserted>...best way to make something earthquake proof is not put it on a fault line...of course it's completely reckless and irrational of the government to pick a site...right between the prison...and the railway site is a major fault line...</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000814">That is what she said about the hospital. Two days later she said:</text>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000815">
          <inserted>We just say...be sensible, understand, building in flight paths, building near earthquake, adding to this risk is a dangerous, expensive alternative.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000816">This is Vickie. But, of course, such concerns do not worry the Leader of the Opposition when it comes to him committing to building a stadium there.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000817">
          <by role="member" id="627">An honourable member:</by>  And a concert hall.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="2226" />
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000818">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  And a concert hall, an entertainment centre, a convention centre, a park and a science centre for kids. Listen to this guy, will you, this is what he said. This goes to the credibility of this man to be a future premier. When talking about a sports stadium that could at any time be holding 50,000 or 60,000 people, he said—</text>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000819">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="22">Mr Hamilton-Smith interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000820">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  He is saying it again: not 24 hour—so you have to be lucky.</text>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000821">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="22">Mr Hamilton-Smith interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000822">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  I would really like <term>The Advertiser</term> to pick up on this bit. Honestly, could we all listen in silence to how ridiculous his answer is:</text>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000823">
          <inserted>We had one—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000824">earthquake that is—</text>
        <text continued="true" id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000825">
          <inserted>in the early fifties, so it is a risk to the city but...I'd rather take the risk...of a stadium that's used several times a week and is otherwise not full. I'd rather have that close to a fault line than a hospital with thousands of people working in it.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000826">What a dangerous, reckless and damaging comment. So, if there was an earthquake and 50,000 people—his answer would be, 'Oh well, it was worth the risk.'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000827">
          <by role="member" id="627">An honourable member:</by>  Bad luck.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000828">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  'Bad luck. It was worth the risk.' What a ridiculous statement. It is unimaginable how somebody could justify that. In fact, last night, on that august TV show that is all about attacking the government, the conspiracy theorists, <term>Today Tonight</term>, he stated:</text>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000829">
          <inserted>You can't escape it, it's Adelaide, we're all earthquake zone. What would I rather put close [to it]? I'd rather have a stadium than a hospital.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000830">He would rather see 60,000 lives at risk, because he believes there is a fault line there, than a hospital. How illogical and bizarre is that? If the Adelaide Crows had been playing last Sunday at this new stadium, 42,000 people there at risk, he would have said that was—</text>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000831">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000832">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> —I might have agreed—an acceptable risk.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000833">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon: </by> Yes, but not for Port supporters.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000834">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> I am not going to let Port supporters go there: I am not going to see those Port supporters put there. My plea to Adelaide's media is: can this guy be held accountable for what he says? Can he be held accountable for promising to put this state into bankruptcy—a guy who is quite happy to see a football stadium built and 60,000 lives at risk, but he does not want a hospital? It is illogical. If it is an earthquake fault line, according to him, he should not build anything there. His promise should be—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000835">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman: </by> You're getting desperate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009040760fb520cf33343dea0000836">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> I'm getting desperate? I, for one, call into question the competency of the Leader of the Opposition to form a policy with such ridiculous statements. And if a statement like that is not worthy of scrutiny by Adelaide's written media of an alternate premier, I do not know what is—unless of course the printed media, the News Limited media, is so hell-bent on getting this stadium up that it will forgive the Leader of the Opposition for making stupid, ridiculous statements and for putting this state into bankruptcy. It will forgive any inadequacy of the Leader of the Opposition if it gets its stadium up. I think <term>The Advertiser</term> should hang its head in shame, and so should the Leader of the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>