<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-03-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2099" />
  <endPage num="2167" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <text id="20090326109a281a249d48d790000675">
        <heading>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-26">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-26T14:56:00" />
        <text id="20090326109a281a249d48d790000676">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-26T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:56): </by> I have a supplementary question. As the minister has had Woodland Architects do a master plan and has told us that he is going to be providing a more detailed plan for cabinet, if his idea of the boutique hotel is going to proceed, is he going to table that in an amended report to this parliament (as required under the act) and provide it to the Adelaide City Council, or has it been abandoned?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-26">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-26T14:56:00" />
        <text id="20090326109a281a249d48d790000677">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-26T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (14:56): </by> I am really pleased the opposition is expressing so much interest in what should happen to the site after we build a new hospital down the road, because the inevitability of that is plain. It is interesting, isn't it, that the opposition would choose to focus on this narrow issue in the week when they put out three propositions for building on the existing RAH site. So why aren't they talking about their ideas, Mr Speaker—</text>
        <text id="20090326109a281a249d48d790000678">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090326109a281a249d48d790000679">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090326109a281a249d48d790000680">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> We know, Mr Speaker, why they are not talking about their ideas—because they are really bad ideas. They presented this week not a health plan but a political plan. What we know about the Liberals and their politics is that they are not good at politics either. They are very poor at politics. This was a poor political strategy and now they are trying to divert attention away from this poor political strategy. When the process of master planning that site has gone through, we will comply with whatever the regulations and arrangements are. We are being completely open about it; there is nothing secret about it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>