<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-03-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2021" />
  <endPage num="2100" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000654">
        <heading>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="537" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CICCARELLO</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-25">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-25T14:56:00" />
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000655">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-25T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="537">Ms CICCARELLO (Norwood) (14:56): </by> My question is to the Minister for Health. What is the government's response to claims that recent proposals for rebuilding the RAH would block access to the hospital's helipad?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-25">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-25T14:56:00" />
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000656">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-25T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (14:56): </by> I thank the member for Norwood for this important question. Today I was able to reveal that the Liberal Party's proposed—</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000657">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000658">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000659">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> Today I can reveal that the Liberal Party's proposed 12 storey glass tower that is central to two of the Liberals' three proposals for the Royal Adelaide Hospital patch-up would block access to the helipad on top of the adjacent building.</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000660">This morning Dr Matt Hooper (the doctor heading up the new MedSTAR retrieval service—that is the trauma and retrieval service that brings injured people from all over South Australia to the Royal Adelaide Hospital) confirmed that his helicopter pilot's advice was that a building as high as the proposed 12 storey glass tower would cause significant problems. On his advice the helipad, which is vital for transporting hundreds of ill patients every year, would need to be closed on safety grounds. In other words, the hundreds of patients who are brought to the Royal Adelaide Hospital for emergency treatment would not be able to receive that treatment.</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000661">Mr Speaker, the Liberals' deceptive artistic impression of a 12 storey building made it look like a four storey building. Members will notice in the drawings they put out that a 12 storey building was made to look like a four storey building. Our architects have advised us that a 12 storey hospital building would be between 51.7 metres and 55 metres tall. This is 16.6 metres higher than the existing 38.4 metre tall helipad building. So, in other words, the building the Liberals are proposing would be almost 50 per cent higher than the building on which the helicopters land. This analysis of the proposed—</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000662">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000663">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  They do not like this, Mr Speaker. Their propositions are falling down.</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000664">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000665">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for MacKillop!</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000666">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000667">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000668">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  Mr Speaker, this analysis is based on standard hospital buildings with a ground floor of 5.5—</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000669">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000670">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for Unley is warned!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000671">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> This analysis is based on a standard hospital building with a ground floor of 5.5 metres and subsequent floors of 4.2 metres to 4.5 metres tall. So this is an accurate analysis of how tall a 12 storey building would have to be.</text>
        <page num="2065" />
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000672">The Liberals' glass tower—this 55 or 56 metre tower—would not provide the necessary clearance for helicopters. As Dr Hooper explained this morning, if a building is within 250 metres and is 35 feet or more higher than the existing helipad, it will significantly limit accessibility to the current Royal Adelaide Hospital helipad. To comply with safety standards, it would then be necessary for helicopters instead to land at Adelaide Airport and patients then to be transported to the hospital by ambulance. The Liberals laugh at this—they mock—but this is—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000673">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon:</by>  They know they are not building any of their options.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000674">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> That is true. This is a significant and serious flaw in their propositions. You could not use the Royal Adelaide Hospital, with their proposition, for emergency landings of helicopters. Unlike claims made by the deputy on radio—</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000675">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="22">Mr Hamilton-Smith interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000676">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  The leader says, 'Rubbish!' I would challenge the leader to talk to the aircraft safety people to get them to certify—</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000677">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000678">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000679">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  —that they can land helicopters on a building when there is a larger building of the size they are proposing adjacent to it. You cannot do it. Unlike claims—</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000680">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000681">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  Build it somewhere else, the leader says. What would happen, of course, is that if the Liberals were successful—</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000682">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000683">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000684">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  —in building their 'Fawlty Tower', then the helicopters would not be able to drop patients off at the hospital. They would have to be taken back to the airport. This is what Dr Matt Hooper—</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000685">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000686">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  This is what the medical experts say.</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000687">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000688">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000689">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  The opposition says that they have been consulting with doctors. I would like to know which doctors they have talked to. They certainly have not been talking to the doctors responsible for retrieval because what they tell me is that, if you build a 12 storey building adjacent to the hospital, you could not use the hospital to land helicopters. You could not do that.</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000690">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000691">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000692">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  The Basil and Sybil Fawlty of the Liberal Party may believe that their 'Fawlty Tower' is the right way of proceeding, but I can assure them that building a 12 storey building in front of the emergency department would make the emergency landings of helicopters impossible; it would make access to the emergency department—at least during the construction stages—impossible; and it would mean that, if they had to put vital cancer equipment in, which they are taking out of a building and knocking it down, that would mean that the risk to patients who are using that building would be very high indeed.</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000693">In the space of two or three days, their grand plan to rebuild on the RAH site has been proved to be absolutely a failure. There is no way that, properly considered, you could rebuild on that site. We looked at this very carefully: we had engineers, health planners and clinicians—</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000694">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000695">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="2066" />
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000696">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  —warning about building on this site, and what the Liberals have demonstrated with their three propositions—and they will not tell us which one they prefer. They will not consult on it until after the election, so their commitment is to nothing at all. However, what is demonstrated is that, even with the most expensive of the options the Liberals have come up with, which is $1.4 billion, you would not complete the renovations of that hospital. None of the engineering works (the pipes, electricity, air conditioning), all of those services which are underground across the hospital, would be fixed up with their propositions. With none of the propositions put forward by the Liberals would you be able to fix up those services.</text>
        <text id="20090325091d82f4fd374d8680000697">So, $1.4 billion would just be the first price, then there would be subsequent prices of hundreds of millions of dollars to complete the work. We know that to upgrade that hospital on the existing site would cost over $2 billion, yet a new building down the road at $1.7 billion will produce a state-of-the-art hospital which will be complete by 2016, and it will definitely be the best hospital in Australia.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>