<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-03-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1939" />
  <endPage num="2023" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australian Jockey Club</name>
      <text id="200903247afd59dd1ea44edf90000654">
        <heading>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN JOCKEY CLUB</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-24">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN JOCKEY CLUB</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-24T14:59:00" />
        <text id="200903247afd59dd1ea44edf90000655">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-24T14:59:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen) (14:59):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Is the minister confirming that there were no discussions about the removal of references to the sale of Cheltenham that were in the draft report?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200903247afd59dd1ea44edf90000656">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  With the greatest of respect, the member has left her previous occupation. Supplementary questions are not a means to rephrase a question in the manner of cross-examination.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1996" />
        <text id="200903247afd59dd1ea44edf90000657">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Whether it was a supplementary question or not, the opposition have already had two supplementary questions. So, for the purposes of the number of questions that they have, this question counts as a question in its own right, in any case. I would need to have a close look at the supplementary and the original question to work out whether it was just a rephrasing of the original question. I will give the minister an opportunity to respond.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-03-24T15:00:00" />
        <text id="200903247afd59dd1ea44edf90000658">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-24T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT (Lee—Minister for Police, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing) (15:00):</by>  I can respond, and I am happy to do so; I will do so briefly. As I said in my previous answer, I was informed by the Director of Racing, Mr Denis Harvey, that content was not covered in that particular meeting where the chair and the deputy chair came and briefed me about the process.</text>
        <text id="200903247afd59dd1ea44edf90000659">The other aspect that I think the member was asking about is with regard to a draft report. To the best of my memory, I do not remember a draft report being raised with me and, as a consequence, I would not know what was in it or what was not in it. The first time I received the report I referred to in my ministerial statement today was the first opportunity that I had to read and digest the information in the Lipman Karas report.</text>
        <text id="200903247afd59dd1ea44edf90000660">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200903247afd59dd1ea44edf90000661">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>