<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-03-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1939" />
  <endPage num="2023" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cheltenham Park</name>
      <text id="2009032480ae3f8e594c4be5b0000593">
        <heading>CHELTENHAM PARK</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-24">
            <name>CHELTENHAM PARK</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-24T14:38:00" />
        <text id="2009032480ae3f8e594c4be5b0000594">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-24T14:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen) (14:38): </by> I have a supplementary question. Will the minister explain on whose behalf Mr Bolkus was making representations when he made representations about the SAJC to the minister? Was it the stormwater authority or some other party?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-24">
            <name>CHELTENHAM PARK</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-24T14:38:00" />
        <text id="2009032480ae3f8e594c4be5b0000595">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-24T14:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Energy) (14:38): </by> What this person has failed to understand I do not understand. He has never made representations on the part of the stormwater authority. The only small item ever on the stormwater authority board, he absented himself and resigned shortly afterwards. He was employed by the SAJC and, lo and behold, he came on behalf of the SAJC with the SAJC and spoke about the SAJC's interest. That is what I would expect someone to do if I was paying them as well.</text>
        <text id="2009032480ae3f8e594c4be5b0000596">Can I say that this is not an unusual outcome for people involved in that sort of industry. In fact, a demonstration of the quality of his work was how Mr Smith and Mr Downer sought him out as such a worthy partner. Forget your smears and your innuendo. If you have something you want to say, have the courage, go outside. This is why they want an ICAC. They want an ICAC so they have another vehicle for a smear, because that is all they do. They do not want to talk about polls; they do not want to talk about Frome; they do not want to talk about the fact that South Australia is going better than it has ever gone and the Liberals are going worse. They do not want to talk about that, but when the going gets tough, they get smeary—and that is all there is to it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>