<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-03-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1855" />
  <endPage num="1942" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Bushfires</name>
      <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000699">
        <heading>BUSHFIRES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="562" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. G.M. GUNN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <startTime time="2009-03-05T15:40:00" />
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000700">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-05T15:40:00" />
          <by role="member" id="562">The Hon. G.M. GUNN (Stuart) (15:40):</by>  The subject I am going to talk about is one of extreme importance. When the Minister for Emergency Services stood up to make a contribution today in relation to responding to the fires in Victoria, I thought: here we go, we are really going to get some positive action, but what did we get? We got a committee. If you want to lose something, get it off the agenda and refer it to a committee.</text>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000701">I read through the press release carefully, because I wondered who was going to be on the committee. With two exceptions, I doubt whether any of the people on this committee have ever been involved in firefighting, controlled burning off or any other aspects of hazard reduction.</text>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000702">Let us just examine this committee. We have the chief of the CFS. This is totally appropriate, and we have full confidence in him. We have Mr Holmes from the Department of Environment and Heritage, who I understand was a forester, so he would have knowledge in this area. I also do not have a problem with the chief fire officer, but why do we not have someone from local government? The Mayor of Mitcham has been before the NRM committee advising of the hazards in Mitcham. Why do we not have someone like the chairman from Mount Remarkable where, unfortunately, bushfires have occurred on a regular basis.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pengilly</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000703">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr Pengilly:</by>  The member for Stuart. They should put him on it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="562" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.M. GUNN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000704">
          <by role="member" id="562">The Hon. G.M. GUNN:</by>  I'm just a simple farmer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="549" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Venning</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000705">
          <by role="member" id="549">Mr Venning:</by>  You'll be available, too, in 12 months' time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="562" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.M. GUNN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1905" />
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000706">
          <by role="member" id="562">The Hon. G.M. GUNN:</by>  Perhaps with the exception of the member there, I am one of the few people left in this parliament who has actually been involved in land clearing and lit decent scrub fires. I did it on a regular basis in my younger days. We are still involved in burning off stubble and grass, and we absolutely know what it is like and how to light a fire.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3120" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pederick</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000707">
          <by role="member" id="3120">Mr Pederick:</by>  And how to manage it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="562" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.M. GUNN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000708">
          <by role="member" id="562">The Hon. G.M. GUNN:</by>  And how to manage it in the public interest. I say to the minister: I do not know who concocted this particular task force, but I ask him to come into this house and tell us, and justify why there are no ordinary agricultural people on this committee who actually understand—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pengilly</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000709">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr Pengilly:</by>  Practical.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="562" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.M. GUNN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000710">
          <by role="member" id="562">The Hon. G.M. GUNN:</by>  —and have some practical experience. For God's sake, why do we have to have one set of bureaucrats sitting in judgment of others? This is the government's second attempt. It brought this document in here when we came back a couple of weeks ago: 'The Code of Practice for the Management of Native Vegetation to Reduce the Impact of Bushfire'. When this was put in our letterbox, I thought perhaps we had had another win but, when I read through it, I saw that it was the same old nonsense.</text>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000711">I will give you one example. If you have a shed and a water tank with your fire pump, whether it be electric or petrol/diesel driven, you are only allowed to clear five metres. I would like to put the minister and the bureaucrat who wrote this in a situation where fires are coming over the hill, because they really would get more than scorched pants. It is a nonsense. If you had any practical understanding, you would know it is a nonsense. Why do they continue to insist?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. Atkinson</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000712">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. Atkinson:</by>  Why, Gunny, why?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="562" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.M. GUNN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000713">
          <by role="member" id="562">The Hon. G.M. GUNN:</by>  Because they are either bigots or they do not have an understanding of the dangers they are creating for the people of this state. The government has been warned, it has been pleaded with, but it takes no notice. When more of these areas in South Australia go—as they will—and a great deal of damage is done, the government will have no-one but itself to blame, because it has not listened.</text>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000714">Anyone knows that, to control or contain these vast areas of native vegetation, you have to back-burn, and you have to do it at the right time of the day. You have to be able to get in there and you have to have decent access tracks. Five metres is an absolute nonsense, and anyone who knows anything about it knows that it is a nonsense. So, I appeal to the minister and the government to add to the task force at least two or three people who are not public servants, who have had practical experience. I suggest the Mayor of the Adelaide Hills Council or the Mayor of Mitcham, someone like Trevor Roocke, and other people who have had practice and experience—</text>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000715">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="44">Mr Pengilly interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="562" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.M. GUNN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000716">
          <by role="member" id="562">The Hon. G.M. GUNN:</by>  Well, someone who at least has some responsibility. The Mayor of Mitcham told us that his fire prevention officers are having trouble with native vegetation, and that they do not want him to mow the edge of the roads because they might chop off orchids, even though there are hundreds of them in the paddock through the fence—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="530">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000717">
          <by role="member" id="530">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="562">
        <name>The Hon. G.M. GUNN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000718">
          <by role="member" id="562">The Hon. G.M. GUNN:</by>  But, you cannot have that—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="530">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000719">
          <by role="member" id="530">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="562">
        <name>The Hon. G.M. GUNN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000720">
          <by role="member" id="562">The Hon. G.M. GUNN:</by>  —you might do something constructive.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="530">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090305208a2823beeb466aa0000721">
          <by role="member" id="530">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  Order, the member for Stuart! I allow members to complete sentences relating to facts but not rhetoric.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>