<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-03-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1855" />
  <endPage num="1942" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Auditor-General's Report</name>
      <text id="20090305302e7aebf63c49bcb0000364">
        <heading>AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-11-17" qonNum="398">
            <name>AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090305302e7aebf63c49bcb0000365">398 <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Leader of the Opposition)</by> (17 November 2008). With respect to the report of the Auditor-General 2007-08—part B, volume 4, page 1027—Why did medical malpractice claims increase by $46 million in 2007-08?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-11-17" qonNum="398">
            <name>AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090305302e7aebf63c49bcb0000366">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations):</by>  I have been provided the following information:</text>
        <text id="20090305302e7aebf63c49bcb0000367">The outstanding position of medical malpractice claims for SAICORP Insurance Fund 1 (both current and non-current) as at 30 June 2008 changed by an amount of $45.7 million relative to 30 June 2007.</text>
        <text id="20090305302e7aebf63c49bcb0000368">This increase is a combination of new claims reported during the year and existing claims that increased in value during the year. Some of the increase in the value of claims was attributable to a revaluation using revised discount factors and prudential margins, as well as an increase in provisions for claims incurred but not reported.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>