<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-03-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1771" />
  <endPage num="1856" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Stormwater Harvesting</name>
      <text id="200903046cd1b30d20e24dc980001188">
        <heading>STORMWATER HARVESTING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-04">
            <name>STORMWATER HARVESTING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-04T15:07:00" />
        <page num="1828" />
        <text id="200903046cd1b30d20e24dc980001189">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-04T15:07:00" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop) (15:07):</by>  Once again, my question is to the Attorney, and I hope and pray that he answers it. Attorney, what is the scientific basis of your comments, on behalf of the government this week, that deride stormwater harvesting—</text>
        <text id="200903046cd1b30d20e24dc980001190">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200903046cd1b30d20e24dc980001191">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  —I think I got the answer, sir—treatment and re-use is a danger to the public? Is this now the official view of the government?</text>
        <text id="200903046cd1b30d20e24dc980001192">The Attorney-General volunteered a range of thoughts deriding the capture, treatment and re-use of stormwater during a call he made to radio station FIVEaa on Monday. However, a number of councils across Adelaide are successfully and profitably making use of stormwater. The Attorney-General's comments conflict with statements made by his cabinet colleagues and prominent water experts such as the CSIRO, Mr Colin Pitman, and a number of city mayors.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1783" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Chaffey</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the River Murray</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Water Security</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-03-04T15:08:00" />
        <text id="200903046cd1b30d20e24dc980001193">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-04T15:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1783">The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD (Chaffey—Minister for the River Murray, Minister for Water Security) (15:08):</by>  Once again, I take great pleasure in answering this question. The state government's position on stormwater is that we think that stormwater is a worthwhile pursuit. We are investing heavily, with our local government partners, in stormwater projects. What the state government does not support is the direct introduction of stormwater into our potable water supply.</text>
        <text id="200903046cd1b30d20e24dc980001194">The South Australian government believes that there are too many risks and too many variables in the current known technologies in stormwater treatment to inject that water directly into our drinking supplies. The South Australian government will not put at risk the drinking water of South Australians.</text>
        <text id="200903046cd1b30d20e24dc980001195">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200903046cd1b30d20e24dc980001196">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1783">
        <name>The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200903046cd1b30d20e24dc980001197">
          <by role="member" id="1783">The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD:</by>  We will, however, do what is currently being done by the Salisbury council and other local governments. We will invest, with our partners, in harvesting, treating and reusing stormwater for non-potable uses such as parks, gardens and industries. That is what is happening in Salisbury. That is what we intend to do, unlike the opposition which is committed to putting stormwater directly into the drinking water supply, which, of course, this government would not risk.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>