<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-03-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1771" />
  <endPage num="1856" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australian Jockey Club</name>
      <page num="1822" />
      <text id="2009030409880b0708b1426e90001078">
        <heading>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN JOCKEY CLUB</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-04">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN JOCKEY CLUB</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-04T14:45:00" />
        <text id="2009030409880b0708b1426e90001079">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-04T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen) (14:45): </by> I have another question for the Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing. Was the minister aware of and did he approve payments above and beyond the estimated cost of a review into the state's three racing codes conducted by Philip Bentley in early 2007? According to documents from within the Department of the Premier and Cabinet, the estimated cost of the Bentley review was $50,000, later capped at what a file note describes as 'an absolute maximum of $80,000'. However, invoices show a total payment of $109,560.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-03-04">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN JOCKEY CLUB</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-03-04T14:45:00" />
        <text id="2009030409880b0708b1426e90001080">
          <timeStamp time="2009-03-04T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT (Lee—Minister for Police, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing) (14:45): </by> Of course, what the honourable member wants to do here is attempt to muddy the waters with regard to Mr Bentley. Mr Bentley did a very important landscape piece of work that took an extended period of time. Those figures the honourable member quotes are, I think, about right. They do not come as a surprise to me.</text>
        <text id="2009030409880b0708b1426e90001081">What needs to be highlighted is that the piece of work undertaken by Mr Bentley—a very good piece of work—showed the future for the three codes, namely, thoroughbred, harness and greyhounds. Mr Bentley worked closely with people in the industry. It took a longer time to complete than first thought, and, obviously, he needs to be paid for his work.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>