<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-02-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1551" />
  <endPage num="1637" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Housing</name>
      <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000610">
        <heading>PUBLIC HOUSING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-18">
            <name>PUBLIC HOUSING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-18T14:59:00" />
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000611">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-18T14:59:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:59):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. Why is the Treasurer approving the sale of 8,000 publicly owned houses while the federal government plans to build 1,500 publicly owned houses in South Australia? The government's announcement to sell off 8,000 publicly owned houses contrasts with the Premier's media release of 16 February, which states:</text>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000612">
          <inserted>About 1,500 new social houses will be built in South Australia, to be funded by the federal government.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-18">
            <name>PUBLIC HOUSING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-18T15:00:00" />
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000613">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-18T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (15:00):</by>  What an odd question. If the Housing Trust is selling a house, that means the house has been built. The whole stimulus package is about building 1,500 new houses. One does not correlate with the other.</text>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000614">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000615">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000616">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon:</by>  A package they opposed.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000617">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  Yes, that's right: a package they opposed. They wanted to deny every kid in this state a new school, gymnasium, library or science laboratory, and they did not want 1,500 social housing houses. The stimulus package is about jobs and construction of new housing. The decision by the federal government was that, if we are going to build houses, we will make them available for the needy, for those who need low-cost housing.</text>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000618">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000619">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>The deputy leader!</text>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000620">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="48">The Hon. J.M. Rankine interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000621">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  Exactly. What do you think you did when you were in government?</text>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000622">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000623">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000624">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  John Howard ripped away public housing as the responsibility of federal government. He took away billions of dollars towards social housing, which forced the government into a process—and it happened under your government when you were last in office—of rotating our stock and selling our stock to finance the construction of other new builds. The deputy leader would not know too much about housing stocks or Housing Trust homes, because there would not be too many in Burnside.</text>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000625">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000626">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000627">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="12">The Hon. I.F. Evans interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000628">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  Good idea. We will build them at Glenside. Would you like them at Glenside?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000629">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon:</by>  Why didn't we think of it? That's right, we did.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200902181ad3b4da7b96474980000630">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  Thank you. The former leader of the opposition is a bit like Peter Costello. I reckon he is starting to get himself a little bit keen on the top job. One thing Iain Evans can do is: he can count. The comparison between the sales program of the Housing Trust and Kevin Rudd's stimulus package—there is no connection. It was a dumb question.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>