<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-02-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1399" />
  <endPage num="1464" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray River, Lower Lakes</name>
      <text id="2009020527ded31fd6dd407490000419">
        <heading>MURRAY RIVER, LOWER LAKES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3120" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PEDERICK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hammond</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-05">
            <name>MURRAY RIVER, LOWER LAKES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-05T14:22:00" />
        <text id="2009020527ded31fd6dd407490000420">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-05T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3120">Mr PEDERICK (Hammond) (14:22):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Water Security. Has the government made decisions on whether it will adopt a low intervention program for the Lower Lakes and Goolwa Channel, in minimising the risks associated with low flows and water levels? Bioremediation, natural occurring refuges and native species preservation projects, coupled with direct on-demand treatment of localised acidification hotspots, have been proposed as an alternative to massive intervention with sea water or further isolating the lakes with small bungs and weirs in the area below Point Sturt. Locals have expressed the view that these proposals have uncertain outcomes and only compound the problem for the entire ecosystem.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1783" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Chaffey</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the River Murray</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Water Security</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-02-05">
            <name>MURRAY RIVER, LOWER LAKES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-02-05T14:22:00" />
        <text id="2009020527ded31fd6dd407490000421">
          <timeStamp time="2009-02-05T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1783">The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD (Chaffey—Minister for the River Murray, Minister for Water Security) (14:22):</by>  There has been a proposition put forward by one group of residents around the Lower Lakes that we could avoid any kind of engineering intervention if we were to go down the path of bioremediation liming dealing with local hotspots. However, the South Australian government believes that we need to look at all options, that we need to fully consider and do the feasibility of all of those options, and that is what we are currently doing.</text>
        <text id="2009020527ded31fd6dd407490000422">We are currently doing that work, because we make decisions on the basis of the best possible sites. We do not have knee-jerk reactions on the basis of what a particular community may or may not demand at the time. The decisions that this government makes in relation to interventions that we may have to put in place down around the Lower Lakes will be based on appropriate investigations and the best possible science, and we will make those decisions in the best interests of the community.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>