<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-11-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1059" />
  <endPage num="1169" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Glenside Hospital Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="2008112674f8c72128f1401380000779">
        <heading>GLENSIDE HOSPITAL REDEVELOPMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-11-26">
            <name>GLENSIDE HOSPITAL REDEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-11-26T15:23:00" />
        <text id="2008112674f8c72128f1401380000780">
          <timeStamp time="2008-11-26T15:23:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:23):</by>  I ask a supplementary question of the Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Given her answer that she is still considering these matters, why then did she agree to proceed to sell to the Premier for $2.5 million the historic buildings to build a new film hub?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1806" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. LOMAX-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-11-26">
            <name>GLENSIDE HOSPITAL REDEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-11-26T15:23:00" />
        <text id="2008112674f8c72128f1401380000781">
          <timeStamp time="2008-11-26T15:23:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1806">The Hon. J.D. LOMAX-SMITH (Adelaide—Minister for Education, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (15:23):</by>  I really think the member for Bragg has been arguing about the film hub for longer than one can imagine in a completely misdirected way. That building is one of the more unsuitable buildings for a modern facility. It is an exquisite heritage building. It has a beautiful courtyard and it is very elegant, but it is broken up into multiple smallish rooms and—</text>
        <text id="2008112674f8c72128f1401380000782">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008112674f8c72128f1401380000783">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1806">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. LOMAX-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008112674f8c72128f1401380000784">
          <by role="member" id="1806">The Hon. J.D. LOMAX-SMITH:</by>  —frankly, it is not suitable as a modern facility for mental health treatment. In fact, if we were going to be accurate, we would say that patients are not actually using that as a mental health facility. It is for office space. The whole design of the campus in terms of a film hub is to bring on to the campus multiple uses that will destigmatise the management and treatment of mental health patients. I know that some opposite would want to go back to the Victorian model, but that is not our agenda.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>