<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-11-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="927" />
  <endPage num="1000" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gaming Machines (Hours of Operation) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="200811134e95e1ab21c648d180000085">
        <heading>GAMING MACHINES (HOURS OF OPERATION) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="200811134e95e1ab21c648d180000086">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="200811134e95e1ab21c648d180000087">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="200811134e95e1ab21c648d180000088">(Continued from 16 October 2008. Page 514.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="1805" kind="speech">
          <name>Mr GOLDSWORTHY</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Kavel</electorate>
          <startTime time="2008-11-13T11:11:00" />
          <text id="200811134e95e1ab21c648d180000089">
            <timeStamp time="2008-11-13T11:11:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1805">Mr GOLDSWORTHY (Kavel) (11:11):</by>  I rise to speak in support of the bill that the member for Davenport has brought to the house. I know that it has been reintroduced from the previous session of parliament. When parliament was prorogued, the bill fell off the <term>Notice Paper</term>, and the member for Davenport has reintroduced it. When it was before the parliament previously, I spoke in support of it.</text>
          <text id="200811134e95e1ab21c648d180000090">I think it is important that licensed premises that operate poker machines close at a consistent time for some period during a 24-hour period so that people who have issues with problem gambling do not have the avenues to pursue that problem by locating a venue to continue gambling on poker machines. I am pleased to support the member for Davenport's legislation.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="549" kind="speech">
          <name>Mr VENNING</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Schubert</electorate>
          <startTime time="2008-11-13T11:12:00" />
          <text id="200811134e95e1ab21c648d180000091">
            <timeStamp time="2008-11-13T11:12:00" />
            <by role="member" id="549">Mr VENNING (Schubert) (11:12):</by>  Likewise, I always take the opportunity to speak on matters like this, and I congratulate the member for Davenport. I will not speak for very long. I was here in this house when poker machines were introduced. I did not support it then and I never have since, because poker machines should never have gone into local hotels. They should have been restricted to specific licensed clubs. I am happy to support this measure because it restricts the operating hours.</text>
          <text id="200811134e95e1ab21c648d180000092">In our communities we see that poker machine hours are causing a lot of havoc, and I think it is common sense that we have some conformity and at least force people to go home to their family rather than spend all night playing pokies. Again, I commend the member for Davenport, and urge the house to support the bill.</text>
          <text id="200811134e95e1ab21c648d180000093">Debate adjourned on motion of Ms Breuer.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>