<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-10-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="723" />
  <endPage num="797" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Civil Liability (Recreational Trails) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="2008103010e87041367545f2b0000147">
        <heading>CIVIL LIABILITY (RECREATIONAL TRAILS) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Introduction and First Reading</name>
        <text id="2008103010e87041367545f2b0000148">
          <heading>Introduction and First Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
          <startTime time="2008-10-30T11:17:00" />
          <text id="2008103010e87041367545f2b0000149">
            <timeStamp time="2008-10-30T11:17:00" />
            <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (11:17):</by>  Obtained leave and introduced a bill for an act to amend the Civil Liability Act 1936. Read a first time.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="2008103010e87041367545f2b0000150">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
          <startTime time="2008-10-30T11:18:00" />
          <page num="732" />
          <text id="2008103010e87041367545f2b0000151">
            <timeStamp time="2008-10-30T11:18:00" />
            <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (11:18):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="2008103010e87041367545f2b0000152">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2008103010e87041367545f2b0000153">This bill puts our recreational trail network—specifically, the Heysen Trail, the Riesling Trail, the Kidman Trail, the Yurrebilla Trail, and others by regulation—on the same legal footing as public walkways under local government.</text>
          <text id="2008103010e87041367545f2b0000154">Currently walkways, trails and roadworks under local government are exempt under the Civil Liability Act. When we have recreational trails going through private property—à la the Heysen Trail, for example—it is always a huge problem to convince the private land-owner to allow public access onto their property because of fear of being sued for injury, etc. It seems to me that if the community wants the Heysen Trail to go through private property—in order words, public access to private property—then we should put that section of the private property on the same legal footing as trails on public property.</text>
          <text id="2008103010e87041367545f2b0000155">This bill does exactly that. It provides exemption from civil liability under the Civil Liability Act for those private landholders who allow the prescribed trails to go over their property. Obviously, it will then increase the recreational trail network, provide better security for those private landholders, and provide greater recreation opportunities for South Australians. I see the bill as positive, and I hope members will support it. I commend the bill to the house.</text>
          <text id="2008103010e87041367545f2b0000156">Debate adjourned on motion of Mrs Geraghty.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>