<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-10-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="723" />
  <endPage num="797" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <subject>
      <name>White Ribbon Day</name>
      <text id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000861">
        <heading>WHITE RIBBON DAY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="530" kind="speech">
        <name>Ms THOMPSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Reynell</electorate>
        <startTime time="2008-10-30T15:36:00" />
        <text id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000862">
          <timeStamp time="2008-10-30T15:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="530">Ms THOMPSON (Reynell) (15:36): </by> Originally, I intended to spend my time talking entirely about the joys of the Fleurieu Peninsula Food and Wine Festival Fiesta, which has been occurring during October. I will abbreviate that, because there is something else I now want to speak about. I place on record my congratulations to the committee and the participating restaurants and wineries in the Fleurieu Food Fiesta, particularly Victoria Minenko (chair of Fleurieu Peninsula Food) and Cheong Liew (ambassador for Fiesta). I invite members to look at the Fiesta website to see what they missed if they did not participate.</text>
        <text id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000863">The reason I want to focus my remarks on something else today is that I saw an item on Adelaidenow, just before I came into the chamber for question time. It was posted at 12.19pm today. The article states 'Man proud of love rival's car' and continues:</text>
        <text id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000864">
          <inserted>A jilted lover has gone from crushing despair to crushing his rival's car. Plant hire boss Martyn Wright, 30, used one of his 13-tonne diggers to destroy the Toyota land cruiser owned by his employee and childhood friend Anthony Simpson, <term>The Sun</term> reports. Mr Wright 'saw red' after discovering risqué text messages from Mr Simpson, 22, on his partner Linda Kirkham's mobile phone, Chesterfield Magistrates' Court in Derbyshire, England was told. He was given a conditional discharge…But outside the court he said he did not regret his actions. 'Every bloke in the country who has been in the same position as me would cheer what I did,' the <term>Daily Mail</term> quoted him as saying.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000865">The original article in the <term>Daily Mail</term> states:</text>
        <text id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000866">
          <inserted>I brooded on it for a couple of weeks before I did what I did, but everyone in the village knows I'm not a man to be messed with. If you mess with fire you're going to get burnt. That is just one thing you don't do to your mates.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000867">My alarm and concern was raised by this article because in the response in the <term>Daily Mail</term> there were comments such as: 'I like this man! Martyn, you could do a roaring trade hiring your digger to other disgruntled boyfriends. A few years ago I would have been one. Good luck mate.'</text>
        <page num="776" />
        <text id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000868">This week we have seen the launch of White Ribbon Day, which is about men standing up against domestic violence in our community. I was not able to be present this morning, not being a man standing up against violence, but I am pleased to say I have heard many reports of it. I hope I am accurately quoting what I believe Andrew O'Keefe said. Andrew O'Keefe is the host of <term>Deal or No Deal</term> and the Chairman of White Ribbon Day. Although I have not been able to obtain his speech, I have been able to obtain some other remarks from a media release of 5 September in which Andrew O'Keefe says:</text>
        <text id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000869">
          <inserted>Boys receive all kinds of messages about what it means 'to be a man'. Many of these are conflicting and potentially harmful to their development, particularly the expectation to 'be tough' and 'in control'.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000870">My reports from that meeting—and I hope the member for Goyder will signal to me if they are inaccurate—indicate that, at that time, Mr O'Keefe talked about the problems of boys being taught to be in control and that the ultimate form of domestic violence, in his opinion, was when a father kills his children in order to seek revenge on his wife.</text>
        <text id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000871">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="20">Mr Griffiths interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="530" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Ms THOMPSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000872">
          <by role="member" id="530">Ms THOMPSON: </by> The member for Goyder confirms this. The part of domestic violence that is not always understood is the part about control of what a partner does. It is usually a man controlling a woman, but it is not always. However, the overwhelming majority of cases are. I invite <term>The Advertiser</term> to get on board with what Andrew O'Keefe is doing and to challenge these assumptions about being a man means always being in control.</text>
        <text id="20081030aa9385c9b54b4075b0000873">Where is the role of the woman in this situation? She is silent in the story. She is a free individual able to make her own decisions. She might have made a wrong decision, but it was her decision, and what message does she get when someone fights like that over her?</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>