<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="577" />
  <endPage num="645" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Victoria Park Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000573">
        <heading>VICTORIA PARK REDEVELOPMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-10-28">
            <name>VICTORIA PARK REDEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-10-28T15:02:00" />
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000574">
          <timeStamp time="2008-10-28T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (15:02):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Did he bludgeon Labor MPs into initial support for and then opposition to the Victoria Park grandstand, and is there one rule for the member for Adelaide and another rule for other MPs?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000575">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! That question clearly contains debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000576">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  I am sorry: clearly contains what, sir?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000577">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The question clearly contains debate. If the member for Unley wants to ask a question concerning Victoria Park he needs to rephrase it so that it does not contain debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000578">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Premier, is there one rule—</text>
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000579">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000580">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, members on my right! I am happy to go to the next question and then give the member for Unley the call afterwards.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000581">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  No; I am fine, thank you, sir. Premier, is there one rule for the member for Adelaide and another rule for other Labor MPs? On 24 October 2008, regarding the Victoria Park development put forward by the Premier and Treasurer, a Labor MP was quoted as follows:</text>
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000582">
          <inserted>We have been bludgeoned into submission. There was one rule for the ministry and another for us. We had a gutful—</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="613" />
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000583">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for Unley will take his seat. It is not an explanation to quote excerpts from the press. That does nothing to explain the question. I have let it go once but I am not going to let it go on and on.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ramsay</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Economic Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-10-28T15:04:00" />
        <text id="200810289e285630b4a74d8ca0000584">
          <timeStamp time="2008-10-28T15:04:00" />
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN (Ramsay—Premier, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Social Inclusion, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change) (15:04):</by>  I am delighted to answer this question, if it was a question. It was a bit hard to understand, there seemed to be a bit of a problem with the English. We said right from the start that we would never legislate to impose a grandstand on Victoria Park. That is what I promised this parliament and that is what I delivered. I do not tend to use bludgeons on anybody, only a rapier on my opponents.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>