<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="38" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Sector Wages</name>
      <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000542">
        <heading>PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-10">
            <name>PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-09-10T15:50:00" />
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000543">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-10T15:50:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder) (15:50):</by>  My question is again to the Treasurer. Was there a cost blow-out of over $60 million for wage settlements above budget allowances in the 2007-08 financial year? The 2008-09 budget shows that the Treasurer's contingency provisions for employee entitlements in 2007-08 is estimated to be $76 million, against a budget of $15.8 million.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-09-10">
            <name>PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-09-10T15:50:00" />
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000544">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-10T15:50:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (15:50):</by>  Can you say that again?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Griffiths</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000545">
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr Griffiths:</by>  Well, it's obvious. If you can't understand it, I'm not repeating it.</text>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000546">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000547">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  Oh! All right, okay, I'll get it. You're saying that I had a contingency for $15 million for wages or employee entitlements. I will find out exactly what that was. How is this coming from that lot? Every time a trade union goes out there saying that they want a wage rise from government, what does this mob of commos over here do? Give them what they want. Socialism! You embrace socialism. What the collective want, you give. That is not this government. We have taken a very strong position on public sector wages. But you cannot have any morality in the argument, any morality or credibility, if you are coming in here saying that we spent more on employee entitlements than we should have, because if you were up to it you would have caved in on the teachers.</text>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000548">The member for Unley is up there saying, 'Give the teachers what they want.' What does that give us? Where is Paul Caica? A couple of billion to the bottom line. 'Pay the teachers what they're asking for,' says Pisoni from Unley. 'Give them what they want.' When it came to doctors, the member for Bragg—what's her answer? 'Give the doctors what they want.' It is just lunacy. The wages policy of the Liberal Party harks back to the days of collective agreements of socialism where the government of the day simply said to the trade unions, 'Comrade, what do you want me to pay? You can have it.'</text>
        <page num="25" />
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000549">Not this modern Labor Party. Not this modern government. We have realised the error of our policies in the past. We have reformed our policies and we will pay a fair wage and a fair outcome. It took this government to stand up to trade union bullies in the public sector, trade unions that wanted to get big wage rises out of us. We have stood up to them and at some political pain but that is what good government is all about. We fixed WorkCover with a lot of political pain but that is what good government is all about.</text>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000550">For you to come in here and have a whack at me because we may have—and I will get it checked—spent more on wages than we budgeted is hypocrisy and an illegitimate line for a finance minister to run. You would be an appalling manager of finances if the quality of your questions today is indicative of your—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000551">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  I rise on a point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000552">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order! The Deputy Premier will take his seat.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000553">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  I am just wondering, Mr Speaker, if the Treasurer is actually going to answer the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000554">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  There is no point of order. The Deputy Leader of the Opposition.</text>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000555">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080910baea89cefc164fb2a0000556">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>