<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="38" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Ministerial Statement</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Radiation Oncology Review</name>
      <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000223">
        <heading>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY REVIEW</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-09-10T14:41:00" />
        <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000224">
          <timeStamp time="2008-09-10T14:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (14:41):</by>  I seek leave to make a ministerial statement.</text>
        <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000225">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000226">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  On 16 July 2008, the Chief Executive of the Department of Health received a complaint about radiation oncology treatment provided at the Royal Adelaide Hospital from July 2004 to July 2006. The complaint alleged that one of five linear accelerators at the hospital delivered a radiation dose 5 per cent lower than prescribed during the two-year period. Within days the government instigated an independent review to be led by Professor Geoff Delaney, a radiation oncologist from New South Wales. This report has now been completed, and I now table it and associated documents.</text>
        <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000227">The panel was asked to consider whether this under-dosing had any clinical impact on the patients treated and whether the hospital implemented appropriate risk management strategies following the discovery of the under-dosing.</text>
        <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000228">The review panel has concluded that the under-dose is unlikely to have had clinical significance for the vast majority of the 869 patients treated on the machine in question. However, the panel believes that for a small number of patients in three different tumour groups there may be a small but real clinical significance, and these patients should consult their oncologist.</text>
        <page num="9" />
        <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000229">The hospital has identified seven patients who fall into this group. The hospital has contacted the oncologists of these seven patients to ensure that they have ongoing checks on their future health, though the patients will not require additional treatment at this stage. The oncologists are contacting these patients today. The other patients have been sent a letter today assuring them that the report does not find that they have cause for concern regarding their treatment. However, any of those patients who have concerns can contact the Royal Adelaide Hospital for further information or assessment.</text>
        <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000230">The review also makes 14 recommendations. I have asked the Department of Health to take immediate actions to implement all of those recommendations. One of the recommendations is that the report on the incident should be sent to the manufacturers of the treatment planning system to ensure that an extra alert is introduced into the system to help prevent such an error from occurring again. This notification will be happening today.</text>
        <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000231">Another recommendation is to address issues relating to the experience and the medical physics workforce. The report notes that recruitment is difficult due to a national and an international shortage of radiation oncology medical physicists. SA Health has already taken immediate steps to address this and is working to recruit six additional physicists.</text>
        <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000232">South Australians can be reassured that the report confirms that radiation oncology is a very safe form of treatment compared to other medical interventions. The report advises that, although the overall clinical impact might be small, an error such as this provides a significant warning for a potential more serious error in the future and therefore should be considered serious. That is why the government has initiated a further review, to be conducted by Mr Ian Kowalick, that will inquire into the actions taken by the hospital management in response to this incident. I will provide that report to the house after its completion.</text>
        <text id="2008091034f2b42798474ace90000233">I extend my sympathies to the patients and families who have endured stress and uncertainty during this process. I hope this report will be helpful to them and address many of their concerns.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>