<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-07-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4153" />
  <endPage num="4215" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Advertising (Objectivity, Fairness and Accountability) Bill</name>
      <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000142">
        <heading>GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING (OBJECTIVITY, FAIRNESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY) BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000143">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000144">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000145">(Continued from 28 February 2008. Page 2258.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="633" kind="speech">
          <name>Mr KOUTSANTONIS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
          <startTime time="2008-07-24T11:27:00" />
          <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000146">
            <timeStamp time="2008-07-24T11:27:00" />
            <by role="member" id="633">Mr KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens) (11:27): </by> I notice the member for Mitchell standing up, trying to guillotine debate, again. However, the government will have its say on this bill, and I will have my say.</text>
          <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000147">
            <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="23">Mr Hanna interjecting:</event>
          </text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="633" kind="speech" continued="true">
          <name>Mr KOUTSANTONIS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000148">
            <by role="member" id="633">Mr KOUTSANTONIS: </by> I am too quick. I understand that members opposite have been addicted to government advertising. I know that members opposite saw with glee how their current hero and former federal leader John Winston Howard used government advertising to great effect. He used government advertising to such great effect that he was able to compete with the likes of Coca-Cola, Pepsi, KFC, McDonalds and others. In fact, for the first time in our federation's history, the largest advertiser on Australian televisions was the federal government, pouring out Coalition advertising campaigns day after day trying to sell the people something they did not want called WorkChoices.</text>
          <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000149">These ads came in various ways. The federal government had paid actors talking about how great WorkChoices was. It had paid actors carrying tool boxes pretending to be plumbers and electricians talking about how they loved being worse off under WorkChoices and what a great system it was. We saw it with its advertising campaigns for all sorts of government initiatives, whether it be private health insurance, private schooling and government funding on issues simply to try to get a message across—</text>
          <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000150">
            <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="44">Mr Pengilly interjecting:</event>
          </text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="633" kind="speech" continued="true">
          <name>Mr KOUTSANTONIS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000151">
            <by role="member" id="633">Mr KOUTSANTONIS: </by> I also inform the member opposite that displays in the house are out of order. However, having seen the evils of taxpayer-funded government advertising campaigns, this government acted swiftly. All our advertising is factual, verifiable and there to deliver information to the community.</text>
          <text id="20080724c54d283662bb4b0e90000152">Debate adjourned.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>