<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-06-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3773" />
  <endPage num="3872" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Country Health Care Plan</name>
      <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000613">
        <heading>COUNTRY HEALTH CARE PLAN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-06-18">
            <name>COUNTRY HEALTH CARE PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-06-18T15:04:00" />
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000614">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-18T15:04:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder) (15:04):</by>  I have a supplementary question. By virtue of his answer, can the Minister for Health assure that there will be no reduction in the number of GPs within regional South Australia to provide emergency services?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-06-18">
            <name>COUNTRY HEALTH CARE PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-06-18T15:04:00" />
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000615">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-18T15:04:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (15:04):</by>  Come in spinner. I apologise to my colleague who wants me to speed up, but there is absolutely no way I can let that pass without giving a full and frank explanation to the house. The idea that I somehow or other control GP—</text>
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000616">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="9">The Hon. P.F. Conlon interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000617">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  Yes, I know; I understand that. The idea that the state government controls the supply of general practitioners to country South Australia is an absurd one. We attempt to help by funding the Rural Doctors Workforce Agency—$15 million over the next three years. Let me tell the house about the current arrangements in country South Australia in relation to doctors.</text>
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000618">There are currently shortages of medical practitioners in country Australia and South Australia and, like many other jurisdictions, we recruit from overseas. Currently in country South Australia there are 445 doctors in general practice; 296 of those have full registration allowing them to practise as general practitioners; 34 are resident specialists, which means they provide a series of specialist services; but approximately 23 per cent of the total (that is, 104 doctors) in country Australia are overseas trained doctors, and some of these can practise only in limited geographical areas due to the limitations placed on their entry visas by the federal government.</text>
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000619">The Country Health Care Plan will make no difference to these arrangements whatsoever. The only reason that we have doctors in many small remote country communities is that they are conscripted there as a result of the immigration arrangements that have been put in place. I think it is shameful, but that is nonetheless the reality of it.</text>
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000620">We do not currently produce enough doctors in Australia, as a result of federal government policy to reduce the number of doctors-in-training places and to restrict the Medicare arrangements. Fortunately, the Howard government in its last year increased the number of training places. That will, over time, have an impact, but not in the short term.</text>
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000621">We also know that something like 40 or 45 per cent of clinicians in South Australia will retire in the next 15 years. That puts enormous pressure on the supply of doctors at a time when the demand is going up. So that is why we have problems getting access to GPs, not because of actions by this government. Of the 43 hospitals which will become GP Plus emergency hospitals, all are designated as areas of need for the purpose of priority placement of doctors.</text>
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000622">All those GP Plus hospitals are designated as areas of need. Of these 43 sites, 29 are designated as districts of workforce shortage by the commonwealth. This means that they can recruit international medical graduates for those areas with limited registration to work only in that area. That is how the system is being worked now: 13 sites already have overseas trained doctors with limited registration, making a total of 18 such doctors.</text>
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000623">I could go on, Mr Speaker. I will not, but let me say that the issue of the supply of GPs, I believe, will be strengthened by our plan because, with larger training centres—all of these general hospitals will become training hospitals or teaching hospitals—more doctors will be able to train in the country, and we know that if people train in the country they are more likely to pursue careers in the country.</text>
        <page num="3814" />
        <text id="20080618199f9136e7f7403aa0000624">If they are more likely to have support, they are more likely to have interesting and complex cases. That is what is going to make reform happen in the country; that is what is going to deliver more doctors to country South Australia.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>