<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-06-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3703" />
  <endPage num="3775" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Industrial Action</name>
      <text id="20080617111cdb2be8c2412bb0000364">
        <heading>INDUSTRIAL ACTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-06-17">
            <name>INDUSTRIAL ACTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-06-17T14:38:00" />
        <text id="20080617111cdb2be8c2412bb0000365">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-17T14:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (14:38): </by> My question is again to the Premier or the education minister. Will the minister guarantee that arrangements under the new funding model being proposed for schools are not designed to close small schools by a death of 1,000 cuts gradually forcing them to become unviable? A leaked department of education study has shown that, in terms of the 2006 enrolment levels, 175 schools will be worse off under the government's funding model. Basket Range Primary School is shown in the study to be $78,000 worse off under the new funding model. The current chair of the school governing council has estimated a loss of one of the school's four teachers and a reduction in classes from three to two.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-06-17">
            <name>INDUSTRIAL ACTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-06-17T14:39:00" />
        <text id="20080617111cdb2be8c2412bb0000366">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-17T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT (Lee—Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Finance, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing) (14:39): </by> I think that, in part, I have already answered that question. However, I ask the honourable member to table his information and, as I have said, we will look at that. To the best of my knowledge, schools will not be worse off. Certainly, in regard to the honourable member's question, and despite the fact that he is interjecting—</text>
        <text id="20080617111cdb2be8c2412bb0000367">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080617111cdb2be8c2412bb0000368">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080617111cdb2be8c2412bb0000369">
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT: </by>—for small schools, certainly, it is not meant to be a death by a 1,000 cuts; quite the opposite.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>