<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-05-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3367" />
  <endPage num="3442" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>APY Lands Inquiry</name>
      <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000281">
        <heading>APY LANDS INQUIRY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-05-07">
            <name>APY LANDS INQUIRY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-05-07T14:09:00" />
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000282">
          <timeStamp time="2008-05-07T14:09:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Leader of the Opposition) (14:09): </by> My question is again to the Premier. Was he genuine when he told the media yesterday, in regard to abuse in the APY lands, that he wanted to 'lock the bastards up' and, if so, will he support the opposition's call today for an immediate intervention in the APY lands to ensure that there is a significant police, medical and child protection presence in the lands within weeks?</text>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000283">The Premier proposes to respond to Mullighan's report in three months. The government's response announced by the Premier in the house yesterday proposes a range of measures that will take a long time to implement while permanent accommodation is built. Temporary accommodation for police and other workers of the same standard which exists in mining sites can be set up at short notice, thus enabling immediate support for families suffering through—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000284">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Point of order! It is one thing to explain a question, but putting a contrary argument is not explaining the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000285">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  I uphold the point of order. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. Foley</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000286">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. Foley:</by>  Only you would politicise tragedy, Martin.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000287">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Hamilton-Smith</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000288">
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr Hamilton-Smith:</by>  Give us a break.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. Foley</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000289">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. Foley:</by>  You did nothing for eight years.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000290">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>The Deputy Premier will come to order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ramsay</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Economic Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-05-07T14:11:00" />
        <page num="3391" />
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000291">
          <timeStamp time="2008-05-07T14:11:00" />
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN (Ramsay—Premier, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Social Inclusion, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change) (14:11):</by>  What a dishonest, disgraceful question. This is the man who sat in a cabinet that had zero police on the lands. This is a man who sat in a cabinet that had zero child protection officers. This is a man who sat in a cabinet that pulled TAFE out of the lands that gave people employment opportunities. Under the Liberals there were no police on the lands. Under the Liberals there were no child protection officers. And the Liberals pulled out TAFE.</text>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000292">What is just as bad, in the 1980s a bipartisan committee (the Aboriginal Lands Parliamentary Standing Committee) was set up to deal with issues in the lands; to go up there representing the people of the state and this parliament to report on what was going on. It was banned from going into the lands by the former Liberal government of which you were a member. What a disgrace!</text>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000293">There is a difference between zero police on the lands and the fact that we had the guts to intervene. We had the guts to put police on the lands; we had the guts to put child protection officers on the lands. Can I just say this: never has there been a greater phoney in terms of his pretend interest in this issue. The bottom line is that you wanted the cover-up to continue. We have broken the cover-up and we intend to act, because we actually care about the issue. During the time that you were in government, nothing was done. You wanted the cover-up to be maintained, and those days are over.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="interjection">
        <name>Honourable members</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2008050719fd73831e16403c80000294">
          <by role="member" id="627">Honourable members:</by>  Hear, hear!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>