<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-05-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3237" />
  <endPage num="3322" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Paxton Report</name>
      <text id="20080501c512a70a22794893b0000569">
        <heading>PAXTON REPORT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-05-01">
            <name>PAXTON REPORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-05-01T14:57:00" />
        <text id="20080501c512a70a22794893b0000570">
          <timeStamp time="2008-05-01T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:57):</by>  Will the Minister for Health now act on the Paxton summary report recommendation that the Central Northern Adelaide Health Service be reduced? The report states:</text>
        <text id="20080501c512a70a22794893b0000571">
          <inserted>CNAHS has essentially imposed an additional layer of executive management over and above the already existing management structures of the individual facilities.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="3278" />
        <text continued="true" id="20080501c512a70a22794893b0000572">These regional bureaucracies were set up by the government on 1 July 2004. The report recommends that the regional executive positions be limited to six and that all other regional roles should be allocated back to the existing hospital management with direct operational facilities. The CNAHS annual report tabled this week discloses that there are now 916 employees earning more than $100,000, and 12 of these earn more than $400,000. The total cost of—</text>
        <text id="20080501c512a70a22794893b0000573">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="24">The Hon. J.D. Hill interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080501c512a70a22794893b0000574">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  They are not all doctors. The total cost is $146.6 million; 25 of them are your executives.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-05-01T14:58:00" />
        <text id="20080501c512a70a22794893b0000575">
          <timeStamp time="2008-05-01T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (14:58):</by>  For the record, dealing with the highest-paid workers in the Central Northern Adelaide Health Service (I saw the figures the other day), I think that nine earn more than half a million dollars, and every single one of them is a medical officer; in other words, a doctor. They earn a lot of money. We pay them a lot of money for the services they provide. They are not, as the deputy leader is trying to characterise it, public servants who are sitting in an office: they are doctors working for that service.</text>
        <text id="20080501c512a70a22794893b0000576">As the member indicated, the Paxton report has been tabled in here, and it has been provided to the officers who work in the service. We are working through the recommendations with them. I expect, particularly in relation to the issues about unnecessary bureaucracy, the department to take a very hard line and to reduce to the bare minimum the bureaucratic levels that we require. I am happy for them to take that very hard line.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>