<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-05-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3237" />
  <endPage num="3322" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australian Salaried Medical Officers Association</name>
      <text id="20080501a3ff98b2b4ef412da0000478">
        <heading>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SALARIED MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-05-01">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SALARIED MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-05-01T14:26:00" />
        <text id="20080501a3ff98b2b4ef412da0000479">
          <timeStamp time="2008-05-01T14:26:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:26): </by> My question is to the Minister for Health. How many elective surgery procedures have been cancelled as a result of the enterprise bargaining dispute between the minister for Health and the South Australian Salaried Medical Officers Association since the dispute began in October 2007? There have now been a number of strikes resulting in the cancellation of elective surgery. During the last strike, on 16 April, approximately 150 elective surgery procedures were cancelled.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-05-01">
            <name>SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SALARIED MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-05-01T14:27:00" />
        <text id="20080501a3ff98b2b4ef412da0000480">
          <timeStamp time="2008-05-01T14:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (14:27): </by> I am not entirely sure why the Deputy Leader of the Opposition has asked this question, since she substantially answered it herself in her explanation. The industrial action of a week or so ago resulted in 150 procedures in our hospitals being cancelled. That is precisely right. That was the only strike action, if you like. There have been several stop-work meetings, which has meant a number of procedures have been—</text>
        <text id="20080501a3ff98b2b4ef412da0000481">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080501a3ff98b2b4ef412da0000482">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The minister for Health has the floor.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080501a3ff98b2b4ef412da0000483">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> The Deputy Leader of the Opposition knows not what she talks about. I was saying that a number of other stop-work meetings have been held, and some elective surgical procedures have been cancelled in relation to those. As to the precise number, I think it is around 200 all up, but I am happy to get the exact number for the honourable member. Also, there were some delays. I think, from memory, that the health department or I put the figures out in the public domain, so it is no secret, but it is around the order of 200 procedures, and I will say, of course, that that has inconvenienced those people.</text>
        <text id="20080501a3ff98b2b4ef412da0000484">It particularly inconvenienced a number of children whose surgery was cancelled and I said at the time and I say it again: I think the union was wrong to get its members to cancel the procedures for children. It is a different order of business if you are doing something to an adult, but to unsettle children and their families in the way they did I think was just plain morally wrong, and I hope that whatever action they decide to take in the future does not involve interfering with the capacity of children to have surgery that they require.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>