<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-04-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3145" />
  <endPage num="3237" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Oaklands Park Railway Station</name>
      <page num="3182" />
      <text id="20080430632aa97b879540d3a0000527">
        <heading>OAKLANDS PARK RAILWAY STATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="527" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HANNA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mitchell</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-04-30">
            <name>OAKLANDS PARK RAILWAY STATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-04-30T15:03:00" />
        <text id="20080430632aa97b879540d3a0000528">
          <timeStamp time="2008-04-30T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="527">Mr HANNA (Mitchell) (15:03): </by> How can the Minister for Transport say today, on a visit to the newly upgraded Oaklands Park Railway Station, that this project has been completed on time and within budget? In a media release dated 6 April 2005, the minister stated that the $7 million upgrade of the Oaklands Park Railway Station would be completed 'by the end of 2006' and in his own media release issued today, the minister values the final cost of the upgrade at $8.5 million; well over the $7 million budget.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-04-30">
            <name>OAKLANDS PARK RAILWAY STATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-04-30T15:04:00" />
        <text id="20080430632aa97b879540d3a0000529">
          <timeStamp time="2008-04-30T15:04:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Energy) (15:04):</by>  It is a shame, but I do not know why the member for Mitchell has to do this. He has something added to his area to assist his people. I do not know why he wants to do this, but there are two things: I did not actually say in the press release that it was finished on the original time schedule, because that would not have been true, and I did not say that.</text>
        <text id="20080430632aa97b879540d3a0000530">I say two things: one is that the original time scale was not met, one reason being that the member for Mitchell held a public meeting and wanted more consultation on it. There he was at a public meeting with all these people saying there had to be more consultation with the community, and lo and behold, what did I do? I did what he asked for. I'm sorry, I do apologise to the member for Mitchell. I'll try not to do what he asks for in future.</text>
        <text id="20080430632aa97b879540d3a0000531">Secondly, on cost, if you read the press release you will see the cost of the interchange was $6.8 million—and I am not just telling members about it now; all the Liberal members in the Public Works Committee got it. Because we were doing that work, we incorporated about $1.7 million of other works, including some level crossing upgrade out of the Minister for Road Safety's budget and some other works on the line which, because we were working on that line, it was good to do at that time.</text>
        <text id="20080430632aa97b879540d3a0000532">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080430632aa97b879540d3a0000533">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Just listen. All the members of the Public Works Committee have been advised of that. None of the Liberal opposition has suggested what you have suggested—perhaps because they have better information.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>