<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-04-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2873" />
  <endPage num="3016" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Hospital Waiting Lists</name>
      <text id="200804095a93a029b491427ea0001805">
        <heading>HOSPITAL WAITING LISTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-04-09">
            <name>HOSPITAL WAITING LISTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-04-09T14:59:00" />
        <text id="200804095a93a029b491427ea0001806">
          <timeStamp time="2008-04-09T14:59:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:59): </by> My question is to the Minister for Health. Is the minister aware that the Department of Health in New South Wales has issued new guidelines on hospital waiting lists as a result of a finding of the New South Wales Independent Commission Against Corruption in its 'Investigation into the alleged misreporting of hospital waiting list data' dated February 2004; and, if so, is the data published by our department at the same standard, including that published on the website?</text>
        <text id="200804095a93a029b491427ea0001807">The ICAC inquiry found that, although the practices in misreporting hospital waiting list data in New South Wales were not implemented in bad faith, it was of the opinion that the existing guidelines on hospital waiting lists needed to be substantially tightened to adequately reflect the importance attached to waiting list data as a performance indicator of the public health system. In particular, it stated:</text>
        <text id="200804095a93a029b491427ea0001808">
          <inserted>Those guidelines were so loose and ambiguous that they not only created extensive opportunities for data to be artificially manipulated for personal or political purposes, but they also contributed to the making of allegations that improper practices had occurred when they had not.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="200804095a93a029b491427ea0001809">Further, the commission recommended that the Department of Health introduce greater transparency in relation to the precise compilation of the official waiting list statistics.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-04-09">
            <name>HOSPITAL WAITING LISTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-04-09T15:00:00" />
        <text id="200804095a93a029b491427ea0001810">
          <timeStamp time="2008-04-09T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (15:00): </by> I thank the member very much for her question because it highlights a point that the government has been making for a number of years. The comparisons of various states of the commonwealth one with the other in relation to these matters, as the opposition likes to make from time to time, is fraught with difficulties, because each state measures different kinds of things—they measure waiting times starting and finishing at different points in the continuum. I have argued in the past that we have a very good set of results in South Australia but, in comparison with states that have a sloppier recording system, we appear to be in a worse situation. I am grateful to the deputy leader for bringing that point to our attention, because it highlights the difficulty of comparing one state with another.</text>
        <text id="200804095a93a029b491427ea0001811">The second point I would make is that the new commonwealth government is very committed to ensuring that all the states publish data that is of the same rigour and standard, and that is something that I very strongly support. In fact, the new Prime Minister has made it clear that increased federal funding, which is something for which we have been arguing, will flow only if the states undertake to publish data on a true comparative basis. That is also something that I and the government of South Australia strongly support.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>