<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-04-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2625" />
  <endPage num="2710" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Glenside Hospital Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="20080402f06b66c82b874950a0000619">
        <heading>GLENSIDE HOSPITAL REDEVELOPMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-04-02">
            <name>GLENSIDE HOSPITAL REDEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-04-02T14:56:00" />
        <text id="20080402f06b66c82b874950a0000620">
          <timeStamp time="2008-04-02T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:56): </by> My question again is to the Premier. Why is the Premier allowing the sale of nearly half of the Glenside Hospital, preventing an expansion of mental health services, when the Paxton report states that this issue is adversely affecting other general public hospitals? The Paxton report into the efficiency of our health system has identified the urgent need to deal with increasing demands from mental health. It states that 'increasing mental health demand is adversely impacting on the efficiency and cost profile of emergency departments in the hospitals reviewed'. The report goes on to say that 'the flow-on operational effects of this demand have been identified as being problematic, requiring urgent specific focus'.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-04-02">
            <name>GLENSIDE HOSPITAL REDEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-04-02T14:57:00" />
        <page num="2667" />
        <text id="20080402f06b66c82b874950a0000621">
          <timeStamp time="2008-04-02T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (14:57): </by> To draw a connection between what Paxton had to say and the proposals the government has for the Glenside site is drawing such a long bow that I think even Robin Hood would blush. The fact is that the Paxton report talks about the efficiencies operating in the RAH: they did not look at the Glenside Hospital. If the Deputy Leader of the Opposition genuinely and honestly thinks that leaving a 19<sup>th</sup> century building to house mental health facilities on a large lump of land is the best thing we can do for mental health in South Australia, well pity help the public of South Australia if she were ever to become minister.</text>
        <text id="20080402f06b66c82b874950a0000622">Our government strategy is to modernise and contemporise the facilities at Glenside to make them relevant to the current generation of mental health patients, in part, to support that change by selling off some of the land for community purposes, which will give great benefit to her community, which will give her even more electors to look after in her electorate and which will create a new facility for this state. If she seriously thinks that the current arrangements at Glenside are world class, she is deluded.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>