<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-03-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2463" />
  <endPage num="2535" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Torrens Parade Ground</name>
      <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000675">
        <heading>TORRENS PARADE GROUND</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Finniss</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-03-06">
            <name>TORRENS PARADE GROUND</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-03-06T15:01:00" />
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000676">
          <timeStamp time="2008-03-06T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY (Finniss) (15:01): </by> Does the Premier stand by his statement when in opposition on 17 June 1997, when he said—</text>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000677">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000678">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY: </by> If you want to laugh at veterans, that's fine, go for it. The Premier said that he 'strongly supports the Torrens Parade Ground honouring the contribution of South Australians over the years and their armed forces in war and peace'. The South Australian Branch of the Vietnam Veterans Association is currently housed in the Torrens Parade Ground. However, after a review of the rental arrangements, the government has substantially increased the rate payable by the association to some $14,000 per annum.</text>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000679">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000680">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY: </by> Attorney-General, if you want to bag ex-servicemen, go for it; they'll love it. The increase has eaten up a substantial amount of the association's funds to the point where its situation is now untenable and it may be forced to relocate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ramsay</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Economic Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-03-06T15:02:00" />
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000681">
          <timeStamp time="2008-03-06T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN (Ramsay—Premier, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Social Inclusion, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change) (15:02): </by> This is bizarre. Let us remember which premier it was that basically ordered the complete refurbishment of the Torrens Parade Ground, including a request made to the then minister responsible for public works to make sure that the area of the parade ground itself, which used to be a tarmac, was actually more in keeping with its heritage origins, like Horse Guards Parade in Britain, and was refurbished. I remember the minister bringing back some gravel from Horse Guards Parade for me—maybe it was or maybe it was not. It was something that looked like the gravel from Horse Guards Parade.</text>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000682">So millions of dollars later we had a refurbished Torrens Parade Ground, and we then made the further step in order to make it available for veterans groups, including the Returned Services Association and others. I understand there was enormous relief, after years of being stuffed around, when they found a home in the building; and other people have leased other premises. It has been extremely useful for the veterans community to have an appropriate home.</text>
        <page num="2506" />
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000683">I take the point from an interjection about what happened and the difference between us and them when it comes to issues of Vietnam veterans. This government put money into the wonderful sculpture on the parade ground that features an Australian digger alongside a South Vietnamese soldier, not in an angry or defiant pose but, rather, a more reflective pose. In the years I have been in public life, one of the most moving services I have attended was the day on which it was unveiled. In fact, it was the former governor Sir Donald Dunstan who unveiled the statue; and I saw the relatives of those who fell in Vietnam alongside those who fought in the Vietnam War, including in the Australian armed services and the South Vietnamese services. Let us remember what the Liberal response was that day. We were told of a boycott by Howard government ministers—a boycott not only in terms of funding for the memorial but also for official attendance—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000684">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY:</by>  Mr Speaker, I rise on a point of order. My point of order is relevance. The question was: will the Premier intervene to question the $14,000 rent on four rooms in the Torrens Parade Ground? It was nothing to do with the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.</text>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000685">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000686">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000687">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000688">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! I will just rule on the point of order. The question was: does the Premier stand by what he said in 1997 with regard to the Torrens Parade Ground?</text>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000689">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000690">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000691">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN: </by> And not—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000692">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The Premier can just wait. I do not uphold the point of order. He is answering the substance of the question. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000693">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  Thank you. You asked me whether I stood by what I said in 1997. Not only do I stand by what I said but I also acted. Millions of dollars were spent in refurbishing the Torrens Parade Ground to be a permanent memorial and home for our veterans—something that the previous government did not do—and then proceeded to provide funding for a memorial, which we saw Liberals dishonour by a threat of a boycott, because the South Vietnamese flag would be flying. I was proud to stand in front of the Australian flag, flying alongside the South Vietnamese flag, because they are the flags that the soldiers fought under, and they deserve to be honoured on that day—and shame on the Liberal Party for its threats.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="interjection">
        <name>Honourable members</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000694">
          <by role="member" id="627">Honourable members:  </by>Hear, hear!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080306a418961520a846da90000695">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>