<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-03-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2339" />
  <endPage num="2397" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Matter of Privilege</name>
    <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000290">
      <heading>Matter of Privilege</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Matter of Privilege</name>
      <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000291">
        <heading>MATTER OF PRIVILEGE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000292">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by> I respond to the matter of privilege raised by the member for Mitchell earlier today in which he claims that the Premier misled the house. The member for Mitchell alleges that the contents of the Premier's ministerial statement made to the house on 26 February in relation to the report of Mr Alan Clayton into the operations of WorkCover is not consistent with the actuality of the bill introduced by the Minister for Industrial Relations on 28 February, as it relates to the provision for weekly payments for compensable disabilities.</text>
        <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000293">First, the member for Mitchell suggested that the ministerial statement made by the Premier was a statement of the government's legislative intent. It is clear from a reading of the ministerial statement in <term>Hansard</term> that the Premier was outlining the recommendations made by Mr Clayton, not providing the house with the government's policy position or proposed legislation.</text>
        <page num="2361" />
        <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000294">In relation to the specific matter that the member for Mitchell has raised, he claims that the Premier's statement is inconsistent with clauses 4 and 5 of schedule 1 of the Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation (Scheme Review) Amendment Bill. However, the passage of the Premier's statement quoted by the member to the house relates to weekly payments under clause 4 subclause (1)—not, as the member suggests, subclause (2), which relates to a review of payments.</text>
        <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000295">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">The Hon. M.J. Atkinson interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000296">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! Therefore, I can find no basis for giving precedents which would enable the member for Mitchell or any other member to pursue this matter immediately as a matter of privilege. It cannot 'genuinely be regarded as tending to impede or obstruct the house in the discharge of its duties'. However, my ruling does not prevent the member for Mitchell or any other member from pursuing the matter by way of substantive motion.</text>
        <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000297">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1">The Hon. M.J. Atkinson interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000298">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The Speaker is on his feet.</text>
        <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000299" />
        <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000300">
          <event>[Sitting suspended from 13:01 to 14:00]</event>
        </text>
        <text id="200803045353a817d14b484e80000301" />
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>