<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-02-28T00:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2257" />
  <endPage num="2341" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:51:55+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Marjorie Jackson-Nelson Hospital</name>
      <text id="20080228d6aeecf06eb34e9e90000750">
        <heading>MARJORIE JACKSON-NELSON HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-02-28">
            <name>MARJORIE JACKSON-NELSON HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-02-28T15:12:00" />
        <text id="20080228d6aeecf06eb34e9e90000751">
          <timeStamp time="2008-02-28T15:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:12): </by> My question is to the Premier. Has the budget for the $1.7 billion Marjorie Jackson-Nelson Hospital blown out already? In the Treasurer's budget speech he announced $157 million over four years for the relocation of the Adelaide railyards and for new signal facilities to modernise the rail network, and 'to improve the site for the new central hospital', but on 25 February 2008, at a hearing of the Legislative Council Budget and Finance Committee, Mr Jim Hallion said:</text>
        <text id="20080228d6aeecf06eb34e9e90000752">
          <inserted>The first point I make is that the $157 million is about relocation of the railcar depot from North Terrace...so, the major decontamination issues...are covered in the hospital budget not in the rail relocation budget.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="2303" />
        <text continued="true" id="20080228d6aeecf06eb34e9e90000753">The health department has informed the opposition that, for the area of 170,000 square metres that is proposed for the new hospital, the estimate of the cost to build—based on other hospitals built around Australia—is $10,000 per square metre. There was no mention of (or provision for) the decontamination of the site being included in that budget.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-02-28">
            <name>MARJORIE JACKSON-NELSON HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-02-28T15:14:00" />
        <text id="20080228d6aeecf06eb34e9e90000754">
          <timeStamp time="2008-02-28T15:14:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (15:14): </by> I am very pleased to answer this question. I thank the Deputy Leader of the Opposition for asking it. She is obviously confused about the way the costings have been made, but the costs of the—</text>
        <text id="20080228d6aeecf06eb34e9e90000755">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080228d6aeecf06eb34e9e90000756">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080228d6aeecf06eb34e9e90000757">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> You think she's right, do you? Do you on that side honestly think the deputy leader is right on this issue? It would be the first time ever if she were. The cost of the hospital has been estimated at $1.7 billion, and that includes the construction of the site and a whole range of other works associated with it. The removal of the railway lines and the construction of new terminals is part of the DTEI budget, and that is being managed separately. There is some clean-up work that the transport department (DTEI) has to do on part of the site—or adjacent to the site—and there is some clean-up that has to be done—</text>
        <text id="20080228d6aeecf06eb34e9e90000758">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20080228d6aeecf06eb34e9e90000759">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  Just listen. Some clean-up has to be done—or decontamination, if you prefer that term—under the site where the hospital will be constructed. There is allowance in the $1.7 billion—and I am told that it is adequate—to provide for the decontamination of the site. Members have to understand that we are talking about a hospital which takes up a massive amount of the site, and there will be excavation to the extent of having, I think, three floors of car parking and other services underground. So, by the process of actually building the hospital, an enormous amount of contaminated soil will be moved off site. Nonetheless, there is provision in the budget to allow that to happen appropriately.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>