<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2008-02-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2081" />
  <endPage num="2144" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Controlled Substances (Cannabis Offences) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="20080214437c1a1a4f62467fa0000092">
        <heading>CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES (CANNABIS OFFENCES) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20080214437c1a1a4f62467fa0000093">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20080214437c1a1a4f62467fa0000094">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="20080214437c1a1a4f62467fa0000095">(Continued from 15 November 2007. Page 1643.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
          <startTime time="2008-02-14T11:10:00" />
          <text id="20080214437c1a1a4f62467fa0000096">
            <timeStamp time="2008-02-14T11:10:00" />
            <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (11:10): </by> This matter has been well canvassed in both houses. This bill, which I introduced on behalf of Family First, seeks to eliminate the right to expiate for the growing of cannabis plants. The government is opposed to this bill, partly on the basis of the number of cases that will then go to court. Mr Hood and others argue that under this scheme, as provided by the bill, court processes are not changed, and if people are guilty they can plead accordingly without going to court. Therefore, as only the people who think they are not guilty will be those who end up there, the pressure on the courts will not be much greater, if there is any increased pressure at all. I accept that the government is opposed to the measure, but I thank members for their contribution.</text>
          <text id="20080214437c1a1a4f62467fa0000097">Second reading negatived.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>