<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2007-11-22" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1827" />
  <endPage num="1892" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government ICT</name>
      <text id="20071122c4d02580dc82487fb0000649">
        <heading>GOVERNMENT ICT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-22">
            <name>GOVERNMENT ICT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-22T14:55:00" />
        <text id="20071122c4d02580dc82487fb0000650">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-22T14:55:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder) (14:55): </by> My question is also to the Minister for Infrastructure. What are the implications for the whole of government ICT program now that the government's chief information officer, Mr Grantly Mailes, who has had complete control of the program, has resigned?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-22">
            <name>GOVERNMENT ICT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-22T14:55:00" />
        <text id="20071122c4d02580dc82487fb0000651">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-22T14:55:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Energy) (14:55): </by> It would be really good to get a question that did not have some rubbishy comment in it. 'Complete control' is simply wrong. An extremely high level group is set up—steering group, I think it is called. I think the Treasurer is on it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. Foley</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071122c4d02580dc82487fb0000652">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. Foley: </by> The Under Treasurer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071122c4d02580dc82487fb0000653">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> The Under Treasurer is on it, sorry, the chief executive of transport and a number of others. No doubt, he is the most senior executive officer in the ICT procurement. He has done a lot of work on that. That work will continue. I have to tell the opposition spokesperson that we have employees, not prisoners. One of the risks you do have when you seek someone who is highly skilled in an area that is in high demand is that they do go somewhere else. I would personally prefer he did not. What I can say is that it is an employment contract, not a prison sentence. We will carry on, and that very high level team will carry on. I do not believe that there is any risk at all to our procurement program. It has already had some outstanding successes, dramatic reductions in unit costs—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. Foley</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071122c4d02580dc82487fb0000654">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. Foley: </by> Savings of $25 million a year.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071122c4d02580dc82487fb0000655">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> Thirty, wasn't it? It has already had success: it will continue to have success. We have a way forward, and I think we lead the nation in it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>