<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2007-11-22" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1827" />
  <endPage num="1892" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="200711227125e356f71c41df90000520">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Land Management Corporation</name>
      <text id="200711227125e356f71c41df90000521">
        <heading>LAND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-22">
            <name>LAND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-22T14:11:00" />
        <text id="200711227125e356f71c41df90000522">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-22T14:11:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Leader of the Opposition) (14:11):</by>  Does the Premier, without reservation, fully support the actions of the Minister for Infrastructure in all matters raised in a special report to parliament yesterday by the Auditor-General concerning the Port Adelaide waterfront development?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ramsay</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Economic Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-22">
            <name>LAND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-22T14:12:00" />
        <text id="200711227125e356f71c41df90000523">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-22T14:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN (Ramsay—Premier, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Social Inclusion, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change) (14:12):</by>  The Minister for Infrastructure is someone whom you would know is not only a distinguished and senior minister but an officer of the court. As you would know, an officer of the court has additional considerations in relation to ethical obligations and probity. There are other officers of the court here, or would-be officers of the court, including the Minister for Families and Communities, and a couple of others have legal qualifications. The key thing is that the minister sought and received legal advice at the highest level.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200711227125e356f71c41df90000524">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon:</by>  I received it; I didn't seek it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200711227125e356f71c41df90000525">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  He didn't seek it; he received it. He received independent legal advice, which is also, I understand, supported by crown law. You might act because you do not have the same considerations of habeas corpus and other—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. Foley</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200711227125e356f71c41df90000526">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. Foley:</by>  Ultra vires.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200711227125e356f71c41df90000527">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  You might want to act in an ultra vires way, but at least the ministers of this government seek high-level legal advice and follow that legal advice. Can I just say this—</text>
        <text id="200711227125e356f71c41df90000528">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200711227125e356f71c41df90000529">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  No, I am quite happy to be involved in a series of interlocutories with members opposite, but if the minister acted ultra vires, if the minister made a decision to ignore his high-level legal advice, you would have a leg to stand on. But the minister—an officer of the court—received advice from other officers of the court and acted ad idem with them.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>