<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2007-11-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1761" />
  <endPage num="1828" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Australian Workplace Agreements</name>
      <text id="200711210a3754ceefb8498fa0000477">
        <heading>AUSTRALIAN WORKPLACE AGREEMENTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3119" kind="question">
        <name>Mr KENYON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Newland</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-21">
            <name>AUSTRALIAN WORKPLACE AGREEMENTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-21T14:48:00" />
        <text id="200711210a3754ceefb8498fa0000478">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-21T14:48:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3119">Mr KENYON (Newland) (14:48):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Industrial Relations. Can the minister inform the house about the recent statistics released on AWAs that have failed the Howard government's fairness test? Does he think this will still be a problem after Saturday?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-21">
            <name>AUSTRALIAN WORKPLACE AGREEMENTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-21T14:49:00" />
        <text id="200711210a3754ceefb8498fa0000479">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-21T14:49:00" />
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT (Lee—Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Finance, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing) (14:49):</by>  I thank the member for his question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200711210a3754ceefb8498fa0000480">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS:</by>  I rise on a point of order, sir. The question implied a result for Saturday. That is hypothetical. The question is out of order. The election has not been decided. The question clearly implied a hypothetical result; it is out of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200711210a3754ceefb8498fa0000481">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>I think the question had two parts, if I understood it correctly. I uphold the member for Davenport's order about the second part, but the minister is free to answer the first part of the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200711210a3754ceefb8498fa0000482">
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT:</by>  I will stick strictly to the first part, sir; I will ignore the second part. The Federal Workplace Authority has recently released its statistical breakdown of the number of Australian workplace agreements that fail to satisfy the fairness test. As at 31 October 2007, over 16,000 AWAs entered into did not pass the Howard government's so-called fairness test. What this highlights is that Australian Workplace Agreements are incapable of ensuring South Australian workers get a fair go when it comes to their workplace rights. The October 2007 statistics also revealed that the workplace authority is yet to apply the so-called fairness test to over 140,000 AWAs, including those for South Australian workers. This is not the fair go all round that South Australian families expected from the Howard government.</text>
        <text id="200711210a3754ceefb8498fa0000483">The inquiry report into WorkChoices handed down by the Industrial Relations Commission of South Australia was highly critical of the fairness test. It held that the fairness test was a poor substitute for the 'no disadvantage test' because 'it will not prevent a loss of non-protected award and other conditions without adequate compensation'. So, we know that, based on the evidence received throughout that inquiry, the fairness test does not restore the balance in bargaining positions between employers and employees. Even the federal health minister, Tony Abbott, has admitted that workers' protections have been stripped away. Make no mistake, as extreme as the first wave of WorkChoices is, Howard and Costello want to take it even further.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>