<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2007-11-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1687" />
  <endPage num="1761" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Noarlunga Rail Line</name>
      <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000537">
        <heading>NOARLUNGA RAIL LINE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-20">
            <name>NOARLUNGA RAIL LINE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-20T15:11:00" />
        <page num="1723" />
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000538">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-20T15:11:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett) (15:11):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport. That was quite a good speech last night, Patrick. Will the minister apologise to the mayor and the council members of the City of Onkaparinga for his comments made on Thursday 25 October 2007 in response to a question on extending the Noarlunga rail line to Seaford? In a letter to the minister the Mayor of the City of Onkaparinga said:</text>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000539">
          <inserted>Your attack on me and the views I have expressed, which are those of the elected Council, discredits my Council and this is unacceptable. I therefore seek an apology on behalf of Council.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000540">The mayor continued:</text>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000541">
          <inserted>You have attempted to blame the Council—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000542">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000543">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1807">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000544">
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE:</by>  The mayor continued:</text>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000545">
          <inserted>You have attempted to blame the Council for the delays in the feasibility study for the proposed rail extension. This is most unfair and is factually incorrect.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000546">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000547">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2007-11-20T15:12:00" />
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000548">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-20T15:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Energy) (15:12):</by>  From memory, I think what I said was that we were not dealing with a political cleanskin and that she was the former Liberal member for Kaurna. I also said that we held up the feasibility study because the council, not once but twice, came back with alternatives—all absolutely true. I will go further and tell you—just so that we understand who is playing games here—that last week at the request of the council we agreed to meet on the subject of another idea about the route for a possible rail extension. But at the eleventh hour that meeting was cancelled by the council.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="interjection">
        <name>Dr McFetridge</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000549">
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFetridge:</by>  You moved the time then.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000550">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Yes; he says I moved the time. If you remember last week, it is a parliament and we do have to work around it. Here is how I moved the time.</text>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000551">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="39">Dr McFetridge interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000552">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Just listen. You know what he was out telling people before question time today? That the union was in the Industrial Commission because of my comments about a driver—another complete invention. The media knows; they heard your invention.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. Atkinson</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000553">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. Atkinson:</by>  The fabricator.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000554">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000555">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000556">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000557">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Here is what happened. My office spoke to the council and said, 'Can we hold the meeting after question time instead of before?' My PA was put on hold. The council went away, came back and said yes. Then, just before the meeting, the council cancelled. If they had told us they could not make it at that time, we could have accommodated it, because I do not like games being played.</text>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000558">If you think I should complete the feasibility study without looking at the alternatives that are argued, can you please say that now? Just please say it now. Do you think I should shut it down and say, 'I'm not looking,' because I will do that for you if that is what you reckon? I am not looking at any more options from the council. Is that what you want?</text>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000559">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="39">Dr McFetridge interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000560">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  No, you won't say anything, will you? Because once again—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. Atkinson</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000561">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. Atkinson:</by>  Lorraine will stop voting Labor.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000562">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Yes. Lorraine wants an apology. Well I am sorry, she is not going to get one because I am fed up with the games that are being played. It is absolutely clear that they wanted to come and talk—</text>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000563">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000564">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071120ff460d0e81c44fb090000565">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  —to us about an alternative. We agreed to it and then they did not turn up. It is also absolutely clear that Lorraine Rosenberg used to be a Liberal member of parliament. I am not certain whether she wants to run again. Maybe she could clear that up. Maybe she could clear up whether she wants to run again but, until such time, I will keep telling the truth and Duncan McFetridge can keep doing what he does best.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>