<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2007-11-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1567" />
  <endPage num="1636" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20071114fda187a7ffc144d8b0000364">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Transport, Energy and Infrastructure Department</name>
      <text id="20071114fda187a7ffc144d8b0000365">
        <heading>TRANSPORT, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEPARTMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-14">
            <name>TRANSPORT, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEPARTMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-14T14:22:00" />
        <text id="20071114fda187a7ffc144d8b0000366">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-14T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Leader of the Opposition) (14:22):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport. Why did the minister tell the house yesterday that he was announcing new decisions about restructuring and reorganising TransAdelaide and the Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure when the changes were, in fact, announced in June this year?</text>
        <text id="20071114fda187a7ffc144d8b0000367">The minister's statement to parliament yesterday led the house to believe that the government was announcing new measures to deal with community concerns about public transport safety, reliability and standards. However, in June this year, in Budget Paper 1 (page 6 of the 2007-08 budget) the government stated that 'ownership and control of all metropolitan transport rail assets will be integrated into the Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure'.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-14">
            <name>TRANSPORT, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEPARTMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-14T14:23:00" />
        <text id="20071114fda187a7ffc144d8b0000368">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-14T14:23:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Energy) (14:23):</by>  It was absolutely clear that, when we commenced this review work in April, one of our key objectives was to remove that corporatisation the Liberals had created to lead to privatisation. It was not clear how we were going to do it. </text>
        <text id="20071114fda187a7ffc144d8b0000369">What the Leader of the Opposition needs to acknowledge is that that was not the only thing announced at the end of the review. I will not go through it at great length; I will simply refer him to the ministerial statement made yesterday. However, I did refer to new executives going into TransAdelaide and a customer focus, and I foreshadowed some further changes—and there will be more to talk about that in the future. So, if this is the first question from the Leader of the Opposition—</text>
        <text id="20071114fda187a7ffc144d8b0000370">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071114fda187a7ffc144d8b0000371">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Let me tell the Leader of the Opposition, I have come back from Alexander Downer this morning, and he was a lot sharper than this bloke. If I were the Leader of the Opposition, I would be very, very afraid, because he is a lot sharper than he is. I have got to tell you this: he asked a lot tougher questions than that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>