<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2007-10-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1407" />
  <endPage num="1482" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>TRUMPS</name>
      <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000450">
        <heading>TRUMPS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-25">
            <name>TRUMPS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-25T14:44:00" />
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000451">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-25T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett) (14:44): </by> My question is to the Minister for Transport. What is the minister doing to fix delays, registration errors and cost blow-outs being encountered with the Transport Regulation User Management Processing System (TRUMPS)?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-25">
            <name>TRUMPS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-25T14:45:00" />
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000452">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-25T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Energy) (14:45): </by> I want all members to note that the honourable member said 'cost blow-out', because he was on the radio again today saying that there was a cost blow-out in the TRUMPS program, which he knows is not true. He knows—</text>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000453">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="39">Dr McFetridge interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000454">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> Mate! I think our serial misleader has a glass jaw. The truth is—</text>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000455">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="39">Dr McFetridge interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000456">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> Yes, and the truth is—</text>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000457">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="39">Dr McFetridge interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000458">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>The member for Morphett will come to order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000459">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> Nothing cheers me up like the misfortune of others!</text>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000460">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="39">Dr McFetridge interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000461">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> Oh, dear, it is still not going any better for you. The truth is—</text>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000462">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="39">Dr McFetridge interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000463">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> No; just let me talk. The honourable member cannot hide his embarrassment by interjecting all day. As the honourable member well knows—</text>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000464">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="39">Dr McFetridge interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1440" />
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000465">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> I am sorry? What is it now? Sir, are they insulting me on the basis of my generous proportions and expecting it to hurt me? Sir, this is all spoken for; it was all well earnt. I think that is very harsh, sir. I can tell members that I look a bit like Brad Pitt in a certain cut of suit. But it does show just how pathetic they are. In New South Wales they call it the bear pit: in here we call it the teddy bear pit!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000466">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000467">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN: </by> I rise on a point of order,  Mr Speaker. If the minister can't or won't answer the question, he might as well sit down.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000468">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>There is no point of order. The Minister for Transport.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000469">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> If people make personally offensive interjections, I cannot help but respond. I was very hurt by that. The truth is that the blow-out to which the honourable member refers is, of course, the fact that the TRUMPS project was started with a certain licensing and registration scheme; and, as was identified by the Auditor-General in last year's report, it had to be changed to take into account what, from memory, is called the graduated licensing scheme, where we converted our licensing scheme for a very simple one where you have a learner's permit and then subsequently a driver's licence into a complex graduated licence scheme. It was well identified that the TRUMPS scheme had to spend a great deal of money to incorporate that.</text>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000470">The truth is that the scheme started, and the criticism of the Auditor-General that was made last year was that those scope changes were not sufficiently dealt with in submissions to cabinet. That has all been changed and fixed up. That was the criticism—not a blow-out—and it is utterly erroneous and misleading to say that. The TRUMPS scheme has had some problems since set-up on two occasions. One of them was an issue with a server company providing services. I will not name it; that is not fair. There were issues with a server company providing services.</text>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000471">On another occasion it was a break in a Telstra line. I will name Telstra because it probably does not like me anyway! Those things happen, okay? It is a new scheme and it will be criticised. It will be a very good scheme for the people of South Australia. There have been issues, and issues with vehicle dealers have been raised today. Our office has been in contact with the MTA and said, 'If there are any issues, can you please contact our office that so we are aware of them and can deal with them.' That is a proper response.</text>
        <text id="20071025fee343e110c04b6790000472">The great way not to have problems with a new system is not to set up new systems. There are problems in new systems. A courageous and a good government introduces new systems. What you must do is to take into account changes in law, such as the graduated licensing scheme. It is just utterly misleading, once again, for the honourable member to suggest that it is a cost blow-out.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>