<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2007-10-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1283" />
  <endPage num="1408" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Fairness Test</name>
      <text id="2007102470c353215a1c4d0390000643">
        <heading>FAIRNESS TEST</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="534" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. L. STEVENS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Little Para</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-24">
            <name>FAIRNESS TEST</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-24T14:53:00" />
        <page num="1326" />
        <text id="2007102470c353215a1c4d0390000644">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-24T14:53:00" />
          <by role="member" id="534">The Hon. L. STEVENS (Little Para) (14:53):</by>  Is the Minister for Industrial Relations. aware of employers being given approval to slash South Australian workers' pay and conditions under the Howard government's Fairness Test?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-24">
            <name>FAIRNESS TEST</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-24T14:53:00" />
        <text id="2007102470c353215a1c4d0390000645">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-24T14:53:00" />
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT (Lee—Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Finance, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing) (14:53):</by>  I am very aware of that, and I am sure that members opposite will want to hear about it as well. The Howard government's Workplace Authority has delivered clear evidence that workers' pay and conditions can still be slashed under WorkChoices. The Howard government's Workplace Authority has said that under the Howard government's Fairness Test slashing workers' pay and conditions is fair.</text>
        <text id="2007102470c353215a1c4d0390000646">I am advised that a South Australian employer formally asked the Workplace Authority whether its proposed workplace agreement passed the Fairness Test. The proposed agreement cut overtime penalties, slashed loadings for weekend work, abolished paid breaks, abolished annual leave loading, and increased ordinary working hours. I understand that in exchange for that there was to be a supposed $50 a week increase in the base rate but, when the slashing of workers' entitlements is added up, many workers would be $70 worse off—many other workers would be even more worse off. One of the workers affected has said publicly that last year he earned $51,000 but the proposed agreement would see him lose $15,000 a year. So, under the Howard government's Fairness Test $70 a week less pay for longer hours is fair. On 5 September this year the federal Minister for Workplace Relations said:</text>
        <text id="2007102470c353215a1c4d0390000647">
          <inserted>Employees have more protections in place than ever before, ensuring that penalty rates, overtime and other protected conditions cannot just be taken away without fair compensation. The Labor Party and unions continue to scare people and lie about penalty rates. They continue to criticise the Fairness Test.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2007102470c353215a1c4d0390000648">The Howard government has spent tens of millions of taxpayer dollars peddling poisonous propaganda to try to deceive Australians. The evidence is all here for everyone to see: the Howard government's so-called Fairness Test says slashing workers' pay and conditions is fair. What is clearly shown is that WorkChoices means working longer for less—even with the so-called Fairness Test.</text>
        <text id="2007102470c353215a1c4d0390000649">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2007102470c353215a1c4d0390000650">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>