<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2007-10-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1135" />
  <endPage num="1207" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Tour Down Under</name>
      <text id="20071018f0fb3dfb9c6948bc80000506">
        <heading>TOUR DOWN UNDER</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Finniss</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-18">
            <name>TOUR DOWN UNDER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-18T15:00:00" />
        <text id="20071018f0fb3dfb9c6948bc80000507">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-18T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY (Finniss) (15:00): </by> Can the Minister for Tourism advise the house if the reduction in 'other income' in the Auditor-General's Report on the South Australian Tourism Commission of $1.2 million is the amount of sponsorship withdrawn by the Orlando wine company as the former principal sponsor of the once-titled Jacob's Creek Tour Down Under? The sudden and major withdrawal of the Orlando company sponsorship left the South Australian taxpayer to pick up the can for much of the cost. Information made available to the opposition is that the Orlando company refused to be bullied by the Rann government into doubling its sponsorship and, accordingly, withdrew this major cash injection from the race.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1806" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. LOMAX-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Children's Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-18">
            <name>TOUR DOWN UNDER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-18T15:01:00" />
        <page num="1175" />
        <text id="20071018f0fb3dfb9c6948bc80000508">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-18T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1806">The Hon. J.D. LOMAX-SMITH (Adelaide—Minister for Education and Children's Services, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (15:01): </by> I thank the member for his question, but point out that his attack on one of the best businesses in South Australia and one of the most loyal sponsors in the private sector does him no credit. Over many years we have had a long relationship with Jacob's Creek. It is one of those businesses, through Pernod Ricard, that is an all-out star, not just in this state but nationally and internationally. It has brought extraordinary commitment to the tourism sector by supporting not just major events, and a whole range of them, but also investing in the cellar door/restaurant outlet at their own winery. Its investment has been very significant, because it has supported the industry both within the Barossa and Adelaide. The reality is that we are still in a strong relationship with Jacob's Creek because it is still a sponsor. In fact, the officers who operate out of South Australia regard the relationship with the SATC in good part, and we respect their support for our industry.</text>
        <text id="20071018f0fb3dfb9c6948bc80000509">It is a pity that those opposite would want to talk down tourism when we have the highest bed occupancy on record, consistent growth year on year, and bed nights from our major events; and the AHA is supportive of the occupancy levels and the number of events. We are bringing new events, ranging from the Guitar Festival to the Rugby Sevens; making events annual instead of biennial; and increasing the Tour Down Under to a Pro Tour event and, in the process of that, getting massive extra sponsorship. Those opposite of course know that specific sponsorship deals are very often commercial in confidence, but I can assure those opposite that our relationship with our sponsors is as strong as ever and we will continue to work with Jacob's Creek. We are still in negotiations with the company over various sponsorships, and that is as it should be—because Jacob's Creek is a strong supporter of South Australia, as is Pernod Ricard, and we hope that continues.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>