<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2007-10-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1063" />
  <endPage num="1136" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Parliamentary Committees</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Natural Resources Committee: Eyre Peninsula Natural Resources Management Board</name>
      <text id="200710172dcd5dc574e34198b0000112">
        <heading>NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE: EYRE PENINSULA NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT BOARD</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <startTime time="2007-10-17T11:59:00" />
        <text id="200710172dcd5dc574e34198b0000113">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-17T11:59:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">Mr RAU (Enfield) (11:59):</by>  I move:</text>
        <text id="200710172dcd5dc574e34198b0000114">
          <inserted>That the 14th report of the committee, entitled Eyre Peninsula Natural Resources Management Board levy proposal 2007-08, be noted.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="200710172dcd5dc574e34198b0000115">I am sure everyone will be pleased to hear that this is the final report the committee will be tabling this year in respect to NRM levies. It contains the same recommendations as the other reports we have already tabled on NRM levies—that is, with the exception, of course, of the KI report about which I have already made some remarks. However, some specific issues arose during the consideration of the levy proposed by the Eyre Peninsula board, which I would like to highlight. The Eyre Peninsula NRM region covers a substantial portion of South Australia. It is the most sparsely populated region in which a levy is raised, and it has around 1,800 kilometres of surrounding coast and associated marine environments. With a population of around 65,000, this relatively small revenue base, and its very large demand for NRM services is the main reason for the large individual levies that were proposed and the main source of contention for the board.</text>
        <text id="200710172dcd5dc574e34198b0000116">Debate adjourned.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>