<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2007-10-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1063" />
  <endPage num="1136" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000415">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Desalination Plants</name>
      <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000416">
        <heading>DESALINATION PLANTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-17">
            <name>DESALINATION PLANTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-17T14:22:00" />
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000417">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-17T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Leader of the Opposition) (14:22): </by> My question is to the Premier. Is it still possible that the Premier could break his promise to build a desalination plant in Adelaide? On 26 September the Premier told the house that the government was committed to a desalination plant. He repeated his promise made on radio that day. However, yesterday, on ABC Radio, the Treasurer revealed three times that there was no firm commitment. He said, first, 'If we build a desalination plant.' He then said, 'We haven't given a firm commitment.' Finally, he qualified the prospect of a desalination plant by saying, 'It is almost certain.' Who do we believe?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-17">
            <name>DESALINATION PLANTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-17T14:23:00" />
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000418">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-17T14:23:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (14:23): </by> If that is the best the Leader of the Opposition can do—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000419">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams: </by> What figures were Moody's basing its assessment on?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000420">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! If the member for MacKillop has a question, I am happy to give him the call.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000421">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> After he said that borrowings are revenue, I think the member for MacKillop should refrain from making fiscal policy statements. The Premier has made it very clear that the government is committed to building a desalination plant.</text>
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000422">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000423">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000424">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> Yesterday's discussion was in the context of the Auditor-General's report and in the context of the fiscal, borrowings and debt position of the state. No cabinet decision has been taken. We do not know what the final—</text>
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000425">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000426">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000427">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> We have no final cost yet, sir. A working group is working through as we speak. It is yet to give government its final report. We have been briefed on it, but we are yet to receive it. We are yet to make final decisions relating to the project. We are scoping the project for its site. We are scoping the project for the length of discharge pipe that would be required. We are considering what would be needed for expansion. We are considering the implications of dam expansion in the Adelaide Hills. </text>
        <page num="1091" />
        <text id="200710179136db1e4f944c9990000428">We are considering a whole range of issues relating to both a desalination plant and the expansion of dams. That is totally consistent with a prudent approach. If members opposite want to split hairs and use the first question time in parliament to question whether or not I am conservative in my approach to these interviews they should go right ahead. A commitment has been made but no final decision has been taken because we have not yet got final advice or even the final location for where a desalination plant would be located. If the opposition wants to be taken seriously as an opposition it has to come up with better than that. </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>