<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Estimates Committee B - Answers to Questions</name>
  <date date="2011-07-08T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Estimates Committee B - Answers to Questions</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="9" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:43:38+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Regional Development Infrastructure Fund</name>
      <text id="2011070860da9faf820142b8b0000130">
        <heading>REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FUND</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-08">
            <name>REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FUND</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2011070860da9faf820142b8b0000131">In reply to <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder)</by> (4 July 2011).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Public Sector Management</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Government Enterprises</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Gambling</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-08">
            <name>REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FUND</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2011070860da9faf820142b8b0000132">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Public Sector Management, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Consumer Affairs, Minister for Government Enterprises, Minister for Gambling):</by>  A total of 12 applications totalling $5,101,724 were lodged in 2010-2011.</text>
        <text id="2011070860da9faf820142b8b0000133">Three applications totalling $560,000 were withdrawn at the applicants' request and await resubmission.</text>
        <text id="2011070860da9faf820142b8b0000134">Nine applications totalling $4,541,724 were assessed in 2010-2011. Of these, two applications totalling $865,312 were unsuccessful as a result of not meeting the fund's assessment criteria.</text>
        <text id="2011070860da9faf820142b8b0000135">No individual applications were lodged that exceed the funding available.</text>
        <text id="2011070860da9faf820142b8b0000136">The number of applications received that met the fund's assessment criteria did not exceed the funds available.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>