<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Estimates Committee B - Answers to Questions</name>
  <date date="2011-07-08T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Estimates Committee B - Answers to Questions</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="9" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:43:36+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Family Day Care</name>
      <text id="2011070824b2dbee4d0841cd80000105">
        <heading>FAMILY DAY CARE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-08">
            <name>FAMILY DAY CARE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2011070824b2dbee4d0841cd80000106">In reply to <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley)</by> (30 June 2011).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Early Childhood Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Science and Information Economy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-08">
            <name>FAMILY DAY CARE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2011070824b2dbee4d0841cd80000107">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Minister for Education, Minister for Early Childhood Development, Minister for Science and Information Economy):</by>  A key factor for the increase in the 'cost per child for Family Day Care' of $304 between the 2009-10 actual and the 2010-11 Estimated Result is an 8.7 per cent reduction in estimated child numbers factored in the 2010-11 Estimated Result.</text>
        <text id="2011070824b2dbee4d0841cd80000108">The child numbers for Family Day Care, as published in Budget paper 4, page 166, were 11,100 for the 2009-10 actual compared to 10,132 in the 2010-11 Estimated Result.</text>
        <text id="2011070824b2dbee4d0841cd80000109">The increased 'cost per child for Family Day Care' does not reflect an increased cost that each family is required to pay.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>