<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Estimates Committee B - Answers to Questions</name>
  <date date="2010-10-15T00:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Estimates Committee B - Answers to Questions</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="37" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:43:17+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Water Project Costs</name>
      <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000194">
        <heading>WATER PROJECT COSTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-15">
            <name>WATER PROJECT COSTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000195">In reply to <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop—Deputy Leader of the Opposition)</by> (11 October 2010).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-15">
            <name>WATER PROJECT COSTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000196">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA (Colton—Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development):  </by>I am advised that:</text>
        <text continued="true" id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000197">Bird In Hand WWTP Upgrade</text>
        <page num="15" />
        <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000198">The approved Bird In Hand wastewater treatment plant upgrade requires capital expenditure of $60 million to be incurred from 2009 to 2014. SA Water's approved 2009-10 capital budget included an allocation of $35.5 million from 2009 to 2013 for this project with these estimated costs based on early concepts.</text>
        <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000199">An extensive consultation process implemented for this project allowed input from community groups, local residents and government agencies thus ensuring that all stakeholder values were managed. As well, the application of an Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) process during the development phase required refinement of the project costs estimate, construction schedule and risks, and identified the need for an increased project budget.</text>
        <text continued="true" id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000200">Bolivar</text>
        <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000201">The original approved budget was based on an early concept, prior to any option being selected. The preferred option adopted included an upgrade to the pump station with additional capacity to meet system growth in the future.</text>
        <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000202">The original scope of the project has increased during the options development and the commencement of detailed design phases which have impacted on the original estimate.</text>
        <text continued="true" id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000203">Augmentation of the Middle River Water Supply System</text>
        <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000204">The original approved budget of $10 million was prepared based on an early feasibility study for the Storage upgrade with no site yet identified. </text>
        <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000205">However, with the draft concept design now nearly complete and a valuation for the land acquisition of the preferred site undertaken, a further refinement of the cost estimate was possible in line with the identified technical and commercial risks associated with the project. The current estimate is $20.3 million. </text>
        <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000206">The preferred site is on a slope and close to residential properties. This has added additional costs due to additional earthworks and sound proofing of the buildings.</text>
        <text id="20101015e63df3544fec4e0fa0000207">When investigating the concept design, the mode of disinfection of the water has been recommended to be changed. This will allow more consistent compliance with the Department of Health requirements, but also increase the estimated costs.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>