<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Estimates Committee B - Answers to Questions</name>
  <date date="2008-07-04T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Estimates Committee B - Answers to Questions</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="98" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:41:29+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Contaminated Water</name>
      <text id="200807048a5b82a459ea44b8b0000334">
        <heading>CONTAMINATED WATER</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-07-04">
            <name>CONTAMINATED WATER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="200807048a5b82a459ea44b8b0000335">In reply to <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition)</by> (1 July 2008).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-07-04">
            <name>CONTAMINATED WATER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="200807048a5b82a459ea44b8b0000336">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts):</by>  I have been advised:</text>
        <text id="200807048a5b82a459ea44b8b0000337">1.&amp;2.&amp;#x9;The issuing of health alerts is done in accordance with established public health principles, the basis of which is a thorough assessment of the level of risk to the public. Not all contaminated sites pose an immediate threat to public health.</text>
        <text id="200807048a5b82a459ea44b8b0000338">In relation to the General Motors-Holden (GMH) Woodville site, the Department of Health was notified in 2001 that chromium and petroleum hydrocarbons had been detected in shallow groundwater beneath the SA Manufacturing Park at 853-867 Port Road. Chromium was reported to be detected at concentrations exceeding the Australian Drinking Water Guideline value in some of the monitoring bores located on this site. The groundwater flow in the area is in the westerly direction. No chromium was detected in an off-site monitoring bore located down-gradient, approximately 50 metres to the west of the western site boundary.</text>
        <text id="200807048a5b82a459ea44b8b0000339">A portion of the GMH site has been redeveloped for a commercial bulk-goods activity (Bunning's warehouse). The site is bounded by industry and a cemetery to the west, a racecourse to the north and mixed residential-industrial areas to the east and south. A search of registered bores recorded in the Department of Land, Water and Biodiversity Conservation drill hole enquiry system identified several bores within a one kilometre radius of the site. The only down-gradient registered bore in close proximity to the site is a drainage bore which is not used to extract water. There are some registered bores located to the south-east which are up-gradient (upstream of the groundwater flow) of the site.</text>
        <text id="200807048a5b82a459ea44b8b0000340">Based on the flow characteristics of the groundwater and the location of residences, it was deemed that there was little risk to human health from chromium contamination of shallow groundwater at this site and no public health warning was issued by the then Department of Human Services.</text>
        <page num="91" />
        <text id="200807048a5b82a459ea44b8b0000341">The Department of Health recommends as a matter of course, that bore water is not to be used for drinking, cooking or watering edible plants without testing to prove suitability. Shallow unconfined (that is, bores that extract water from aquifers that are not confined between layers of impervious rock or clay) bores are the most susceptible to contamination and are not recommended for domestic use.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>