<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Estimates Committee A - Answers to Questions</name>
  <date date="2013-07-05T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Estimates Committee A - Answers to Questions</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="18" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:35:23+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Sector Employment</name>
      <text id="2013070544ed1f9bfb2845d590000094">
        <heading>PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-05">
            <name>PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2013070544ed1f9bfb2845d590000095">In reply to <by role="member" id="563">the Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport)</by> (26 June 2013).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-07-05">
            <name>PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2013070544ed1f9bfb2845d590000096">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier, Treasurer, Minister for State Development, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for the Arts):</by>  I have been advised of the following:</text>
        <text id="2013070544ed1f9bfb2845d590000097">1.&amp;#x9;The Commissioner for Public Sector Employment collects a snapshot of the South Australian Public Sector annually through the Workforce Information Collection (WIC).</text>
        <text id="2013070544ed1f9bfb2845d590000098">2.&amp;#x9;The WIC provides historical trend data on the shape and size of the SA public sector. It does not calculate forward estimates on the makeup of the SA public sector.</text>
        <text id="2013070544ed1f9bfb2845d590000099">3.&amp;#x9;The attached table shows the change in the breakdown of employees considered to be frontline services versus those in 'back office' roles. It outlines how between 2010 and 2012 there was an increase in frontline staff of 1,438 and a decrease of back office staff of 607.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>