<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Estimates Committee A - Answers to Questions</name>
  <date date="2010-10-15T00:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Estimates Committee A - Answers to Questions</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="29" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:33:50+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Health, Non-Operating Funds</name>
      <text id="20101015bb15b0570658452fb0000145">
        <heading>HEALTH, NON-OPERATING FUNDS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-15">
            <name>HEALTH, NON-OPERATING FUNDS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20101015bb15b0570658452fb0000146">In reply to <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett)</by> (11 October 2010).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-15">
            <name>HEALTH, NON-OPERATING FUNDS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20101015bb15b0570658452fb0000147">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts):  </by>Response by Chief Executive of the Department of Health on 11 October 2010:</text>
        <text id="20101015bb15b0570658452fb0000148">
          <inserted>'Yes, as the Minister said, we have progressively improved the controls around non-operating funds over the last two or three years. Clearly, as Mr O'Connor said, there are some residual practices that are not in accordance with our own policies. The officer concerned has been formally counselled and the matter fixed (my emphasis). As the Minister said, there has been no loss of public funds and the funds have been returned to the non-operating fund and will be used in accordance with the requirements of that particular non-operating fund.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20101015bb15b0570658452fb0000149">
          <inserted>When we first set about improving the procedures for non-operating funds, there was a great deal of concern because people were using them as virtual individual slush funds and we have totally removed that practice. This was a different matter. It was sloppy work and the person who did it will be held to account for it, but across the system the non-operating funds are managed in a far more accountable manner than they ever had been in the past.'</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20101015bb15b0570658452fb0000150">Further response:</text>
        <text id="20101015bb15b0570658452fb0000151">This statement was based on verbal advice received in the chamber from the Executive Director, Finance and Administration, Department of Health.</text>
        <text id="20101015bb15b0570658452fb0000152">The Chief Executive has now received advice from the Director, Corporate Finance that he was incorrectly advised during Estimates with regards to the statement 'that the officer/s concerned had been formally counselled'.</text>
        <text id="20101015bb15b0570658452fb0000153">A letter was sent to the officers involved on 18 October 2010 and they were formally counselled on Thursday, 21 October 2010.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>